World Series — Game 1 notes, Game 2 chat

Including the postseason, the Giants have four 3-HR games at home this year. The last three have come in support of Barry Zito. In those three games, Zito has allowed 22 hits and 5 walks in 17.1 IP, but no HRs.

Pablo Sandoval has an RBI in 6 straight postseason games. His career-long streak in the regular season is 5 games. The MLB postseason record is 8 games, shared by Alex Rodriguez (yes!), Ryan Howard and Lou Gehrig. Only Howard did it in one season; Gehrig split his streak neatly over the 1928 and 1932 sweeps, with a total of 17 RBI in the 8 games.

Al Alburquerque is the only pitcher in MLB history who has allowed a HR in the postseason (2 in 22 batters), but none in his regular-season career (56.2 IP, 235 batters). He has the most innings of any active HR-free pitcher, and ranks 3rd for the live-ball era; Arnie Stone holds the live-ball record at 76.1 IP. Both postseason HRs off Alburquerque were epic; besides Panda’s third of Game 1, he also served up the only postseason grand slam by a Yankee this century, on the 2nd pitch of his postseason debut.

The last two postseason RBI by a pitcher against Detroit came from one of the greatest WS performers of all time.

By my count, teams that won Game 1 at home have gone on to win 41 of 62 Series. Teams that won games 1 and 2 at home have won 29 of 36 Series.

Neither of the Game 2 starters has much experience against the opposing hitters. All Tigers combined have just 34 PAs against Madison Bumgarner (10 for 31, all singles) and none has more than 10 trips. Among the Giants, only Marco Scutaro has ever faced Doug Fister, with just a single in 11 ABs, but 2 walks against 1 strikeout.

Tim Lincecum is likely unavailable tonight; he’s never pitched consecutive days in the majors. Alburquerque has never worked the day after going more than one inning.

Questions:

  • Speaking of Fister, am I the only one who keeps mispronouncing it as Jack “The Giant Killer” Pfiester?
  • Surely I’m not the only one who knows that, over the last two years combined, among the 78 pitchers with at least 300 IP, Fister ranks 10th with a 131 ERA+, five spots above, say, Matt Cain (123), and also leads Cain in WAR by 8.1-6.9 in that span?
  • Can you think of any reason for Pablo Sandoval‘s career splits? On the road: .278 BA/.791 OPS. At home: .328/.900.
  • Would Melky Cabrera have made either of the synchronized diving catches that Gregor Blanco made last night?
  • Would Hunter Pence fare better if he went to the plate with his bat already broken?
  • Which team will be more discombobulated by their unfamiliar position? The Tigers never trailed in the first two series, while the Giants never led.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

106 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

Not at all sure of the wisdom of playing Garcia over Dirks in these two games, given that Young is playing in the OF as well.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I guess I just think Dirks has established himself as a good all around player, whereas Garcia was in AA ball in August and now you’re starting him in the World Series? He hangs fairly tough against lefties. I have seen Garcia display a good arm, I agree with that.

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

Blanco’s synchronized diving catches reminded me of Greg Nettles’ synchronized diving stops in the ’78 World Series.

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

Does Fister now own Matt Cain’s previous crown as “best active pitcher with a career W-L percentage below .500”?

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
12 years ago

A lot of that Pablo split discrepancy comes from

Home 2009
.361 .412 .600 1.012

And Road 2010
.208 .266 .299 .565

I don’t have any answers, but remove those outliers and the numbers even out somewhat.
_____________________

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

Has anyone else felt that Erin Andrews brings a little too much gravitas to her role as a sideline reporter? Her demeanor reminds me of the CNN gang from the hotel in Baghdad. Lighten up Erin, this are boys in big guy pants playing a game:

Larry
Larry
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Along with maybe some bunny ears and a cottontail  🙂

Hartvig
Hartvig
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I’d be OK just watching her read the phone book while wearing a parka.

But Larry’s suggestion has a LOT of merit.

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

Interesting, a camera at 3000 frames per sec has dispelled the myth that the barrel of the bat is above the ball. All three of the Panda’s HRs were distinct uppercuts – just like those swings have looked live since the first game I saw in 1962, all through the NBC Games of the Week, in every still shot , etc, etc. One very interesting aspect of the super slo-mo is the demonstration of the harmonics of the bat. I recall reading in The Physics of Baseball that a well struck bat/ball impact on the sweet spot with the typical… Read more »

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  Larry

Larry: Here is how to get an interesting article on the physics of the bat hitting the ball. Google “What If Superman Played Baseball?” Despite the comical title it is a highly scientific article complete with videos. Once you bring up the article scroll down a short distance and click on the violet words “the physics of baseball” and read.

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

Yes, that was very interesting. I just can see a bat and ball both surviving the impact that would impart enough energy to send the ball a mile – about 10 times further than hit by a human. I would think the inertia of the bat at rest coupled with a sudden acceleration to Mach 2 would snap the bat handle below the barrel and above the “hands”. It is not a function of the barrel of the bat sustaining so many pounds per square inch.

Larry
Larry
12 years ago
Reply to  Larry

* I just can’t see that, I meant to say

Bells
Bells
12 years ago

For a more fantastical, but relatively scientific study…

http://what-if.xkcd.com/1/

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  Bells

“A careful reading of official Major League Baseball Rule 6.08(b) suggests that in this situation, the batter would be considered “hit by pitch”, and would be eligible to advance to first base.”

🙂

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  Bells

I have *ahem* 4809 posts on their forum. 🙁

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

In the pre-game, Lou Brissie was mentioned as they honored several MLB players who served in WWII. He nearly had his left leg amputated after it was shattered by schrapnel in 1944, yet he was able to come  back and pitch in an All-Star game. Great trivia: he was part of a three way deal between the A’s, Indians, and White Sox that had Minnie Minoso going from Cleveland to Chicago.

Jameson
Jameson
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

He was out.
I can’t believe Lamont sent him.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

It was me. He’s done much worse than that. I really think the fault there was Prince’s–bad slide. You watch where the catcher sets up and go with a hook slide to the opposite side. And you know that Posey won’t be blocking the plate.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

You’re right John. He had no business sending him there.

kds
kds
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

MLB averages in 2012. Stop at 3rd 55.5%. Score 41.8%. Out 2.6%. Yeah, Prince was a lot worse than average. In game 1, after the funny DP where Delmon was tagged out by Posey who then threw to 2nd for another tag out, McCarver said, more than once, that if Young had run he could have beaten any force DP. I doubt it very much, Bill James’ speed score had DY as the 5th slowest MLB regular in 2012. 3 other Tigers were in the molasses 30. Buster would have had extra time from not tagging the batter, and Crawford(?)… Read more »

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  kds

What’s missed in all teh discussions of that play I have seen is the fate of the ball in left field. If you watch the home plate camera angle closely which shows the third base coach, you’ll see him react to the ball bouncing with momentum off of the foul wall near the third base line. He sees the ball careen, sees blanco turn towards center field, and sends fielder. Blanco fields the ball like a second basemen fielding a grounder and fires home with a forceful throw. So forceful it misses the cutoff man but scutaro is in the… Read more »

kds
kds
12 years ago
Reply to  kds

Blanco had the ball before Prince got to 3rd. Lamont could (should?) have stopped him then.

Howard
Howard
12 years ago
Reply to  kds

I agree that if Lamont had advance information that the next two batters would pop up and strike out then it was the right move to send Fielder.

Robbs
Robbs
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

If Casey at the Bat author Ernest Thayer had a snarky streak would he say
“Delmon doubled to the corner,off a curve that seemed to float, but then the Fat Man sent the Big Man, and that was all she wrote…”

Robbs
Robbs
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

The prelude to Johnny (P) at the Bat!!
You are too much,John. Hopefully Tiges make it a series starting tonight.

Jameson
Jameson
12 years ago

Tim McCarver just suggested that MLB require pitchers to wear helmets.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  Jameson

After seeing that I think I agree with him.

Evil Squirrel
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I hate McCarver as an announcer, but it cracked my a** up when he said that! I don’t care if he was trying to be funny or was actually dead serious….

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  Evil Squirrel

Did you watch the play? That ball could readily have killed Fister.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  Jim Bouldin

My mistake, thanks John.

Evil Squirrel
12 years ago
Reply to  Jim Bouldin

JA is correct in that I was referring to a Game 1 comment, but I see how you were confused. I was actually out last night and didn’t see the liner back at Fister, other than the clip from that baseballgif site someone provided earlier…

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

Holy Christ I don’t really care too much who wins now, I’m just glad that Fister wasn’t killed by that ball, or seriously injured. That was extremely close to being a tragedy.

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  Jim Bouldin

I don’t mean to be too morbid or to pretend to be a doctor but I’m of the opinion the era of life threatening baseballs is over. The main threat from these events is brain swelling. These days, when the event happens we get the pitcher to a hospital quickly and the skull is cut open giving room for the brain (the removed chunk is re-attached later). There are some places on the skull that are weaker than others to be sure but the baseball itself is not a bullet and batted ball speeds do not exceed 100mph by much,… Read more »

Larry
Larry
12 years ago
Reply to  mosc

Mosc, not quite true. Base coaches now wear batting helmets because a coach died in MiLB after being struck by a batted ball. The pitcher is a mere 60 feet away. More like 55 after he finishes his follow through. The batter is mandated to wear a helmet. The runner is mandated to wear a helmet. The coach is mandated to wear a helmet. What is missing from this picture. Ah, yes, let’s see ….. The PITCHER. In today’s age of plastics, surely a light weight design could be perfected that would be no more annoying than a cap, a… Read more »

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  Larry

It’s true, you don’t need a football helmet on them to add some protection. I’m sure something small and light would add a lot of safety without changing much.

I’m also always watching when a pitcher takes off their hat and whipes. Seems like fingers tend to find their way into that hat brim a few more times than I’d like to see… A less conspicuous helmet would maybe deal with that as well.

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

John A-those child deaths from being struck in the chest have not been limited to baseballs. A girl died in the UK after being hit by a rugby ball. Apparently, taking one off the chest at the precise moment between heartbeats can cause cardiac arrest. Horrible stuff. I agree on the thin-handled bats. Baseball ought to be making as many reasonable safety measures as possible.

no statistician but
no statistician but
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

JA and Mike L: I’m not entirely up to speed, so to speak, on the thin-handled bats. Do batters think they’re necessary to compete against the superabundance of 95-MPH pitchers? Would there be even more strikeouts without them? Or are they just, as the once novel thinner handle bats were for Banks and Aaron in the 1950s, a means to power for a less bulky guy? If it’s all about home runs and nothing else, don’t expect reason to prevail, or not, God forbid, until an icon like Pujols is impaled, and even then the National Bat Association would probably… Read more »

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

In 2008 MLB, in conjunction with others, including the Forest Products Lab of the USFS, conducted a fairly major and thorough study on bat breakage and its causes. This led to some changes implemented in the following couple of years, including a decrease in the maximum allowable barrel diameter and an increase in the minimum allowable handle diameter. I cannot remember the specs for the latter. Also studied was the relative role of species and grain parameters in bat shattering. It had been thought that the increase in maple bats (from 2003 when Bonds set the HR record with one)… Read more »

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Anyone know, generally speaking, how fast the ball would have been traveling when it hit Fister?

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

@82: Jim, Do you happen to know whether the increase in maple use is also a product of diminishing ash stock, due to ash borer depletion? I’ve been wondering for some time whether ash was gonig the way of the chestnut, and the long-term effect on baseball.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

epm, I don’t believe the ash borer issue has yet significantly affected the supply, because the invasion front of the insect is still expanding and will be for some time (although neither am I sure of that, because I don’t know where the wood suppliers are targeted, geographically). However, the potential for it to do so over the next couple decades is very real. The ash borer is probably the most destructive invasive pest to hit North American deciduous forests to date. The Chestnut blight was/is very serious also, but only that one species was affected, whereas several ash species… Read more »

no statistician but
no statistician but
12 years ago
Reply to  Larry

epm:

The Ash borer hasn’t yet reached the forests where the wood comes from for baseball bats, and there are now several ways to ameliorate the effects of the insects in urban areas, although trees in the wild pose a far different level of difficulty concerning protecting individual trees. There is, I believe, a Purdue University website on saving ash trees from the borer—don’t have tome to look it up—and there may be others as well.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

nsb, those protections are next to worthless. They may delay the death of individual trees a couple years in urban/suburban settings but that’s about it. Some type of biological control will be needed for forest environments, or else the development of genetic resistance, which is typically a very long slow process in trees (witness the chestnut blight).

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
12 years ago

Jim and nsb, thanks both. nsb, hunting online, you’re clearly right that the specific forests where ash bats are born haven’t been affected, though they’re no longer far from danger and apparently Louisville Slugger has a back-up plan to shift towards replacing ash with beech, as well as more maple. The Purdue site does suggest that the greatest practical impediment for treatment may be cost rather than chemical effectiveness, but Jim clearly knows this stuff, and having watched the borer range continue to spread, the prospects look grim to me. Good thing baseball bats were never chestnut-dependent — and now… Read more »

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

In investigating a little further, I found that Louisville Slugger gets most of their ash from somewhere along the NY-Penn state line, and I would guess that would be in the Allegheny mountain region based on some other clues. Given that the EAB has been slowly expanding across PA for five years now, and that there are also new infestations in SW NY, it’s strictly a matter of time until they have to switch source locations, and/or species. This is the first time I’ve heard of beech being used, but I can see it given that it has mechanical properties… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago

Not to be heretical, but you can see a future in which bats are made of composite materials to an agreed-upon specification, with the only variances being in weight and length.

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago
Reply to  mosc

If you look at the film you realize how lucky Fister was. He caught it high and to the side, not on the temple or on the facial portion, so not all the energy was absorbed. The cap protecte his scalp. BTW, the surgery Mosc describes (opening a window in the skull) is probably the oldest procedure. There are burial sites from around 10,000 BC where many skulls have signs of trepanning. We Yankee fans need to distract ourselves with obscure information.

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

http://www.mlbgifs.com/2012/10/doug-fister-hit-in-the-head-by-a-gregor-blanco-comebacker/

Didn’t know this site existed – MLBGIFS – for when you just can’t get enough of a replay.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  Larry

I’d like to see a replay of that call on Infante at second last inning because it looked to me like he was safe.

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

The Giants are “in the zone”. If only there were a way to quantify it, or explain it. It is a real, palpable phenomena in sports but getting a handle on it is like nailing mercury.

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

I realize that SF doesn’t have much depth in the outfield but Hunter Pence MUST have incriminating photos of Bochy. It’s the only explanation for how he’s still in the lineup and batting 5th.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

Time for Cabrera or Fielder to lose a Bumgarner mistake.

Jason Z
12 years ago

What Doug Fister has accomplished tonight is amazing.

That guy could pitch for my team any day of the week.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

I cannot believe they stuck with Smyly through that inning and he got out of it with only one run scoring. Why in the world was he pitching to Theriot there?

This is where the loss of Valverde as closer really hurts because Coke would normally have been in there.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

This umpire not giving the low strike to the Tigers but doing so for the Giants is just out of hand. Smyly was letting him know about it too.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

WTF IS WRONG WITH THIS UMPIRE???

James Smyth
12 years ago

With that sacrifice fly, this will not be the seventh postseason game in which there were no RBIs. All 1-0 games…four had the run score on a DP and three had the run score on an error Game 2 2001 NLDS – Braves 1 Astros 0 – Rey Sanchez DP Game 3 1999 NLCS – Braves 1 Mets 0 – Gerald Williams stole 3B, Mike Piazza E2 brought him in Game 1 1986 WS – Red Sox 1 Mets 0 – Rich Gedman reached on Tim Teufel E4 Game 7 1962 WS – Yankees 1 Giants 0 – Tony Kubek… Read more »

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

It was certainly in effect for the ’68 All Star Game.

scott-53
scott-53
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I’m thinking you can’t assume the run would score on a doubleplay groundball. Especially with the infield playing in. No gloves in the 1800’s.

kds
kds
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Baseballlibrary.com has a chronology of changes in baseball rules. About the only mention of RBI that I see in the chronology is that it became an official scoring stat about 1920. Of course you can look up RBI leaders in the 1800’s but I think they were figured later, probably for the publication of the Baseball Encyclopedia in 1969.

Lawrence Azrin
Lawrence Azrin
12 years ago
Reply to  kds

So without RBI totals, how did they know who was the most “clutch” before 1920?

kds
kds
12 years ago
Reply to  Lawrence Azrin

Everyone was clutch, there were no automatic transmissions. Going back further, even the railroads and horses were clutch. Didn’t you know, all the players had much better fundamentals then, no sissy boys like today. Old Hoss started 73 games (of 112) in 1884, unlike those wimps now. (NOT the record, by the way.) The Gas House Gang, now they knew clutch. AAMCO wouldn’t have a chance against them boys. Dizzy knew how to shift speeds.

If Cap Anson never knew he had set the RBI record, that’s one thing to be glad of.

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

In game 2 of the 1940 WS between the Tigers and the Reds Hank Greenberg hit into a 5-4-3 DP on which a run scored and was not credited with an RBI.

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
12 years ago

Since the Tigers have gone down 0-2 away – and I always suspend my NL loyalties to root for the Tigers – I’m hoping for a repeat of a pattern I once found especially interesting. When I first started following the World Series, no team had ever come back from an 0-2 deficit. Then in ’55, Brooklyn dropped the first two games, but came back to win in seven: the home team won the first six games, but the visitors won the last. Amazingly (and, for me, dismayingly), that precise pattern occurred again the very next year, Brooklyn and the… Read more »

scott-53
scott-53
12 years ago

Television contracts???

scott-53
scott-53
12 years ago
Reply to  scott-53

ABC started (baseball) game of the week coverage in 1953. CBS took it over in 1955.

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
12 years ago
Reply to  scott-53

TV then wasn’t the economic force it is now, but there were eleven seven-game Series in those 17 years, as opposed to four in the most recent 17 years. Since players only share in the revenue from the first four games, perhaps the added games were just a gift to the ad execs, testimony to the personal charisma of those classic Mad Men — or maybe players were receiving under the table payoffs of Gillette Blue Blades in those days of low salaries and beardless teams. . . .

scott-53
scott-53
12 years ago

Good point! well groomed teams.The winners share was also enough to double the salary of more than half the team.

Jim Bouldin
12 years ago

I wonder if there are any data out there on pitchers hit by batted balls and continuing to pitch (I doubt it). The number of times for a pitcher to get hit in the head by a line drive, and then continue to pitch for several innings, has to be extremely short.

kds
kds
12 years ago
Reply to  Jim Bouldin

In the WS* the Dizzy one was going into 2nd trying to break up a DP. The relay throw caught him right in the ‘ole noggin, leading to the classic, (and possibly apocryphal) headline, “X-Rays of Dean’s head reveal nothing.”

Before batting helmets became mandatory many players wore inserts in their caps to give some protection.

* It was ’34 game 4, Jay Hanna was pinch running for the pinch hitter for 2nd Card’s pitcher. There was no DP and the tying run scored, but that was all for the inning. Dean wasn’t pitching anyway.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/SLN/SLN193410060.shtml

Larry
Larry
12 years ago

http://www.motownsports.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-98333.html This site talks about a rule change in 1939 concerning RBIs and double plays. There is a guy in Detroit who is trying to get Hank Greenberg an extra RBI that would tie him for the seasonal record. There was a fast pinch runner on first who “most likely” would have gone first to third on the subsequent hit. Problem is, there is no documentation that he DID you to third. Greenberg hit a grounder where the defense got an out but the throw to first got away. If the pinch runner had made it to third, then it… Read more »

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  Larry

I agree for RBI’s by hitting into a no out double play. I also agree on errors charged after the first out is made. I admit that is a pitcher centric scoring system but why not? Scoring rules don’t change anything in terms of baseball strategy or the end result, they’re just for stat compilation and more correctly associating credit/blame. The pitcher gets credited for an earned run if he walks the bases loaded and then gets the double play doesn’t he? Then the hitter should get credit for putting the ball in play. He gets an RBI for a… Read more »

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

You make some great points John! Here’s how I see it. Sure, it cost two outs but the team did in fact score a run. Isn’t that a positive? What if the batter had popped out or struck out? Then the team may have scored zero runs. (obviously depending on what the subsequent batters did) Seems like the fair thing to do would be to credit the RBI but “harm” the batter in some other way, such as charging two at-bats.

Larry
Larry
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Great comment! How do Sacrifice Flies rate on the WPA scale?

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

John: I did an analysis using a Win Expectancy calculator from post #18 on the blog “Four Homers in a Game” which was posted last May. I did it from the perspective of the home team. For the situation of first and third and no one out in a tie game and the batter grounds into a DP with the runner on third scoring, the WPA always goes down except for the eighth inning when it increases by 0.05. Doing the same thing for the bases loaded situation yields similar results except that the eighth inning increase is 0.03.

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
12 years ago

Not sure if this has already been mentioned, but I just noticed that the Giants regular season 5-man rotation accounted for 160 of 162 games started. The only other pitchers to start a game were Eric Hacker on April 27th and Yusmeiro Petit on September 23rd. I found it to be pretty remarkable that the front five of Cain (32), Bumgarner (32), Vogelsong (31), Lincecum (33), and Zito (32) were all able to toe the rubber with such regularity. Does anyone know if this has ever been done before?

scott-53
scott-53
12 years ago
Reply to  Brooklyn Mick

Nice find. 5 starters with at least 31 starts. Doubtful that has happened before. The most it could be is 5 starters with 32 starts.

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Thanks John. Looks as though I was typing and toggling and missed your above post. So many things have to go right that I’m surprised it’s happened (158+ games started by 5-man) as often as it has in the last 9 years, and that it happened twice this year.

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

It’s also a reflection of MLB’s attempt to raise revenues by eliminating doubleheaders, and the introduction of domed stadiums.

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago

I can tell you this much. There have been 9 occasions of 5 pitchers on a team starting at least 30 games.

Giants…2012
Reds…2012
White Sox…2006
Indians…2005
Cards…2005
Mariners…2003
Dodgers…1933
A’s…1980
Dodgers…1977

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
12 years ago

Thanks Richard. As it turns out the 2003 Mariners 5-man rotation started all 162 games…Moyer (133), Franklin (132), Piniero (132), Garcia (33), Meche (32). This is how the others did:

Giants…2012 (160)
Reds…2012 (161)
White Sox…2006 (159)
Indians…2005 (158)
Cards…2005 (160)
Mariners…2003 (162)
Dodgers…1993 (160)
A’s…1980 (159)
Dodgers…1977 (159)

Voomo Zanzibar
Voomo Zanzibar
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

The 2003 Mariners did NOT use the same approach with their bullpen.
Of the 154 games that were not CG, games were finished by 12 different pitchers.

Their save leader had 16, and saves were recorded by six different pitchers.

This is appropriate, as they had a bullpen full of closers
(past, present, and future)
Career save totals:

289 Armando Benítez
183 J.J. Putz
132 Rafael Soriano
129 Kazuhiro Sasaki
33 Arthur Rhodes
33 Jeff Nelson
33 Shigetoshi Hasegawa

scott-53
scott-53
12 years ago
Reply to  Voomo Zanzibar

The starters also were an interesting bunch. Two 24 year olds. One 40 year old. One starter that had not pitched for two seasons. one starter that did not even have 30 career starts when the season began…