When the game’s on the line, who do you call on?

When you absolutely must prevent a run from scoring, what pitchers are major league managers calling on this year?

To find out, I selected a subset of games, namely 9th inning walk-off wins after one out. Why those ones? A couple of reasons: first, most of these games will have been tied going to the home 9th, meaning the visitors cannot allow a run; and second, these games can easily be found using the Play Index in Baseball-Reference (whereas 9th inning walk-off wins with no outs are indistinguishable in Play Index from home 9th innings that are not played).

Anyway, this early in the season, it is a small enough set of games to look at each one and play manager (with the obvious benefit of hindsight) . After the jump, we’ll find out who the managers did call on.

So, here are our games. Of course, this sample is of games where the visiting team’s strategy did not work. However, since there was already one out before the winning run scored, the manager did have a chance to adapt his strategy to respond to events occurring during the inning.

Rk Date Tm Opp Rslt IP H R ER BB SO HR Pit Str BF # Comments
1 2013-04-22 TOR BAL L  1-2 8.2 5 2 1 4 9 0 157 95 37 3 Closer not used. LP faced 7 batters in 9th.
2 2013-04-22 ARI SFG L  4-5 8.1 11 5 5 0 8 1 112 80 36 4 Closer not used. LP faced 3 batters in 9th.
3 2013-04-19 SDP SFG L  2-3 8.1 10 3 3 3 4 0 128 83 37 3 Closer not used. LP pitched 8th & 3 BF in 9th.
4 2013-04-17 SFG MIL L  3-4 8.1 9 4 4 4 5 1 142 90 36 2 Closer not used. LP pitched 8th & 5 BF in 9th.
5 2013-04-15 TBR BOS L  2-3 8.1 4 3 3 3 11 1 146 91 31 3 Closer not used. LP faced 3 batters in 9th.
6 2013-04-14 TOR KCR L  2-3 8.1 10 3 3 2 5 0 135 89 37 4 Closer not used. LP faced 3 batters in 9th.
7 2013-04-14 LAD ARI L  0-1 8.1 6 1 1 1 9 0 102 72 32 1 Starter lost CG & faced 4 batters in 9th.
8 2013-04-13 HOU LAA L  4-5 8.2 13 5 4 2 7 1 153 99 39 4 Closer blew save & faced 5 batters in 9th.
9 2013-04-13 PHI MIA L  1-2 8.1 4 2 1 4 9 0 129 88 33 4 Closer not used. LP faced 4 batters in 9th.
10 2013-04-12 SFG CHC L  3-4 8.2 10 4 4 2 10 3 150 96 38 3 Closer blew save & faced 5 batters in 9th.
11 2013-04-12 CHW CLE L  0-1 8.2 3 1 1 1 8 0 125 74 31 3 Closer not used. LP faced 5 batters in 9th.
12 2013-04-07 MIA NYM L  3-4 8.1 6 4 4 4 13 1 159 97 36 5 Closer blew save & faced 4 batters in 9th.
13 2013-04-06 KCR PHI L  3-4 8.2 3 4 4 6 12 0 146 91 35 4 Closer blew save, walking bases loaded with 

no outs & facing 6 batters in 9th.

14 2013-04-06 CHC ATL L  5-6 8.1 12 6 6 3 7 3 132 84 39 4 Closer used in non-save situation in 8th.

LP blew save & faced 3 batters in 9th.

15 2013-04-03 DET MIN L  2-3 8.1 5 3 3 6 10 0 165 100 36 5 LP entered game with ROB & blew save, facing 3

batters in 9th. Detroit is not using a defined 

closer role so far in 2013.

16 2013-04-03 LAA CIN L  4-5 8.1 6 5 4 6 9 1 141 85 39 5 Closer not used. LP faced 3 batters in 9th.
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/23/2013.

Thus, the closer was not used in any of the games that were tied going to the home 9th. The pitchers that were used faced over 3 batters in 5 of the of the 10 tied games. Thus, there was opportunity for the manager to adapt his strategy during the inning. Even if the manager had hopes of getting through the 9th and using his closer in a later save situation, when that strategy began to seem less likely, he still did not go to his closer in a mid-inning pressure situation in the hopes of extending the game.

So, that’s 9th inning walk-off games. How about extra-inning walk-offs – did those games get to extras because the closer was brought in to extend the game?

Rk Date Tm Opp Rslt IP H R ER BB SO HR Pit Str BF # Comments
1 2013-04-22 CHC CIN L  4-5 12.2 9 5 5 6 9 1 184 119 52 6 Closer pitched 9th & 10th
2 2013-04-21 DET LAA L  3-4 12.0 7 4 1 4 16 1 190 115 50 4

No closer for DET. LP pitched 2+ innings.

3 2013-04-20 MIA CIN L  2-3 12.2 13 3 3 8 14 1 226 136 58 7 Closer pitched 12th, 13th and lost. Two

pitchers used in 9th, 10th, 11th.

4 2013-04-18 TBR BAL L  6-10 9.0 14 10 10 1 9 3 136 89 40 5

Closer not used. Two pitchers used in

9th & 10th. LP faced 3 batters in 10th.

5 2013-04-16 (2) NYM COL L  8-9 9.2 13 9 7 7 8 0 200 119 50 8 Closer used in mid 8th with ROB & blew save.

Also pitched 9th inning.

6 2013-04-13 TBR BOS L  1-2 9.1 7 2 1 3 12 1 160 105 38 6 Closer not used. Three pitchers used in 9th

& 10th. LP faced 7 batters in 9th & 10th.

7 2013-04-12 DET OAK L  3-4 11.1 8 4 3 3 17 1 186 118 44 5 No closer for DET. LP faced 2 batters.
8 2013-04-07 SEA CHW L  3-4 9.1 5 4 4 0 5 3 115 79 33 5 Closer not used. Four pitchers used in 9th & 10th.
9 2013-04-03 STL ARI L  9-10 15.1 17 10 10 7 13 3 285 166 71 8 Closer used in 12th & blew save. Two pitchers

used in 9th, 10th, 11th.

10 2013-04-01 COL MIL L  4-5 9.2 8 5 5 5 8 1 151 91 41 5 Closer not used. Two pitchers used in 9th & 10th.

LP faced 7 batters in 10th.

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/23/2013.

Not much different from the 9-inning walk-off games.

  • In games 1 & 2, the closer was brought into a tie game, but not until the 12th inning in game 2.
  • In game 9, the closer was used, but not until a save situation was in order.
  • In games 4 and 6, the Rays didn’t use their closer, despite getting into tight spots before losing each game.
  • In game 8, the Mariners pretty much emptied their bullpen, but still did not go to their closer.
  • In game 10, the closer stayed in the bullpen while the losing pitcher struggled through a lengthy inning.
  • Game 5 was a throwback with a closer used in a pressure situation before the 9th inning, something only Mariano has done with regularity in the recent past.

Conclusion: no change from the status quo we’ve become accustomed to seeing for the last decade or more – closers close only in save situations, and only to start an inning. Everybody else handles the dicier situations that arise late in close games. The fact that the game is over if your team allows a run appears not to be a consideration by managers for bringing in their closers in a non-save situation.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
brp
brp
11 years ago

It’s amazing that front offices allow this level of incompetence from their managers, and that fans aren’t in a blood frenzy.

In the most important spot you play your best players. Isn’t this just common sense?

Bryan O'Connor
Editor
11 years ago
Reply to  brp

This strategy only represents incompetence if we assume every team’s closer is its best pitcher. Teams with a Pedro Strop or Mike Adams or Koji Uehara in the middle of the pen might actually be best served using them in the game’s tightest situations, while the closer fulfills the role he’s used to playing. I’m not advocating for using the same guy to protect a 1-run leads and 3-run leads, which are very different situations united only by a silly statistic. I’m just suggesting that the situations Doug refers to call for the team’s best available pitcher, not necessarily the… Read more »

brp
brp
11 years ago
Reply to  Bryan O'Connor

Well, yes, that’s definitely true. In this case I was just using the common shorthand where “best reliever” and “closer” have become synonymous.

Mike
Mike
11 years ago

Check out tie games after 8 to see how often the home team uses closer in top of 9th. At that point there will be no “save situation” so the mgr should be using his best reliever, unless the tender fellow can’t pitch unless its a “save situation”

I still hear announcers dumbfounded when the closer is brought into such a game.

John Nacca
John Nacca
11 years ago

I hate to beat a dead horse, but…….OVER-MANAGING!!!!!!!

Chirpy McChirpson
11 years ago

Is it possible to pull the games where the visiting team wins? What I’m wondering is, what’s the frequency of the visiting teams closer showing up in a non save situation and the visiting team ends up winning? Thanks.