Jake Arrieta: when it all starts to click

Last Tuesday at Wrigley, Jake Arrieta fanned 13 Reds and faced only one batter over the minimum in a masterful one-hit shutout. That game crowns an impressive campaign in which Arrieta has posted this line, with every one of his rate stats a career best.

Year Age Tm W L W-L% ERA G GS CG SHO IP BB SO ERA+ FIP WHIP H9 HR9 BB9 SO9 SO/W
2014 28 CHC 9 5 .643 2.65 24 24 1 1 149.2 40 157 145 2.30 1.016 6.7 0.3 2.4 9.4 3.93
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 9/17/2014.

More on Arrieta’s breakout year after the jump.

That line is a far cry from Arrieta’s work before this season, which looked like this.

Year Age Tm W L W-L% ERA G GS CG SHO IP BB SO ERA+ FIP WHIP H9 HR9 BB9 SO9 SO/W
2010-2013 24-27 BAL, CHC 24 27 .471 5.23 78 72 0 0 409.2 183 314 80 4.75 1.428 8.8 1.2 4.0 6.9 1.72
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 9/17/2014.

So, is it unusual for someone with a career like Arrieta’s to put it all together with a season like this one? To answer that question, I first considered how unusual this season has been. It didn’t take long to realize it’s not one you see every year (or even every decade). Say what? Well, ask yourself  how many Cubs’ starters have a live ball era 150+ IP season with WHIP under 1.1 and HR/9 under 0.4. In fact, there’s only one, and it’s someone you might have heard of.

Rk Player Year WHIP HR9 IP Age Tm G GS CG SHO W L W-L% BB SO ERA FIP ERA+
1 Greg Maddux 1992 1.011 0.24 268.0 26 CHC 35 35 9 4 20 11 .645 70 199 2.18 2.58 166
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 9/19/2014.

So, pretty unusual, particularly for a pitcher whose prior performance hadn’t exactly set the world on fire. In fact, with an 80 ERA+ in 400+ IP thru age 27, Arrieta’s career was in definite jeopardy. Lest you doubt me, consider this list:

Rk Player Year IP ERA+ From To Age G GS CG SHO W L W-L% BB SO ERA FIP Tm
1 Clint Hartung 1950 511.1 80 1947 1950 24-27 112 72 23 3 29 29 .500 271 167 5.02 5.02 NYG
2 Dick Pole 1978 531.0 79 1973 1978 22-27 122 77 8 1 25 37 .403 209 239 5.05 4.48 BOS-SEA
3 Ryan Rupe 2002 466.2 80 1999 2002 24-27 85 83 2 0 23 37 .383 161 348 5.84 5.03 TBD
4 Charlie Morton 2011 423.0 78 2008 2011 24-27 80 79 3 2 21 39 .350 184 279 5.11 4.38 ATL-PIT
5 Jake Arrieta 2013 409.2 80 2010 2013 24-27 78 72 0 0 24 27 .471 183 314 5.23 4.75 BAL-CHC
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 9/20/2014.

Those are the starting pitchers since 1920 to finish their age 27 season with 400-600 IP and an ERA+ of 80 or lower. Those are also the career totals for Hartung and Pole, and almost the career totals for Rupe (he got 10 more IP). Morton survived an age 28 season of 81 ERA+ to become a regular in the Pirate rotation the past two seasons.

But, that is admittedly a pretty small group. To develop a proper comparison group, I adapted those criteria and compiled a list of pitchers who, at least once in their careers, finished a season with these markers:

  • aged 29 or younger
  • started at least 60% of career games
  • career IP between 400 and 800
  • career ERA+ below 90

In fact, there have been 176 such pitchers (including Arrieta) since 1920 (I included a few pitchers whose careers started before 1920, but who would still qualify if their pre-1920 service was included). You can see them here, showing the season when their career stats first qualified them for this group. Mostly, it’s a nondescript bunch, with the notable exception of two HOF members, Tom Glavine and Red Ruffing (who both just qualified, with an 89 ERA+), and a few other notables (Jamie Moyer, Jerry Reuss, Rick Wise). Arrieta’s 80 ERA+ after the 2013 season is tied for 22nd lowest mark in the group.

To show how modest this group’s accomplishments are, Arrieta will be only the twentieth of those 176 to record a season of 150+ IP and 125 ERA+ before the age of 30. Of the other 19, only Glavine had more than one such season. Relaxing the criteria to find such a season at any point in a career adds only twelve more names.

If we bump up the ERA+ threshold from 125 to the 140 level that Arrieta will most likely hit, only 11 pitchers in the group have such a season, and only four did so before the age of 30. Of those four, one is anomalous (Oliver Perez actually had his 140 season before qualifying for the group), one is Glavine (of course) and the others are Mike Moore and Ricky Bones. Only Bones matched Arrieta’s feat of recording that 140 season the year after first qualifying for this group.

Career value in the group is equally sparse, with only these eleven compiling 20 WAR for their careers.

Rk Player WAR From To Age
1 Tom Glavine 74.0 1987 2008 21-42
2 Red Ruffing 55.4 1924 1947 19-42
3 Jamie Moyer 50.2 1986 2012 23-49
4 Jerry Reuss 33.1 1969 1990 20-41
5 Rick Wise 32.1 1964 1982 18-36
6 Mike Morgan 28.9 1978 2002 18-42
7 Mike Moore 28.2 1982 1995 22-35
8 Ed Brandt 27.8 1928 1938 23-33
9 Mike Scott 24.0 1979 1991 24-36
10 Todd Stottlemyre 21.1 1988 2002 23-37
11 Steve Renko 21.0 1969 1983 24-38
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 9/17/2014.

So, perhaps cast a glance Arrieta’s way next year and see how he follows up this season. He might indeed be the rare late bloomer who is just starting to put it all together.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Autin
Editor
10 years ago

Nice work, Doug. And I think FIP makes Arrieta stand out even more. Of the four comparable pitchers you noted at the 140 ERA+ threshold: — Mike Moore’s ERA was 0.54 under his FIP in his one “140” season. He got a big boost going from a bad Seattle team to a good A’s club. — Rickey Bones had an ERA 1.17 below his FIP in his one “140” year (1994). It was a real fluke year — a hot start, but fading fast when the strike hit. — Ollie Perez’s ERA came in 0.45 under his FIP in 2004… Read more »

RJ
RJ
10 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Funny thing about Glavine is that he had terrible defensive backing in those early years. His first five seasons (four poor years in Doug’s study plus his first Cy Young year) were backed to the tune of -0.32 Runs per 9 IP from his defense, compared to positive 0.35 from his age 26 to 36 seasons.

Using bstar’s defense adjusted ERA+ would actually improve Glavine’s early years ERA+ enough to boot him from Doug’s study.

bstar
bstar
10 years ago
Reply to  RJ

I could write 1000 words on Glavine and his FIP, but to spare some eyes I will just say this about it: -defense has less to do with it than most people think, as RJ notes. -it’s possible Glavine actually did possess some BAbip-reducing skill. Just the mere fact that he forced RHH to consistently hit balls on the outside edge of the plate should tell us he *probably* gave up weaker-than-normal contact. -stranding runners was perhaps Glavine’s greatest skill (and after 5000+ innings, yes, it’s a skill) and is more responsible for his higher FIPs than anything else. -Glavine… Read more »

John Autin
Editor
10 years ago
Reply to  bstar

To be clear, I was not disparaging Glavine — even if a guy had great defense behind him every year (which I’m not saying Tom did), to be successful so many years in a row would still be amazing. Also, I realize Andruw didn’t start until 1997, missing three of Glavine’s 20-win years, and two of his five 140 ERA+ seasons.

And good point about the pitch-arounds. Although it was rather tough to watch in his Mets years, when the chops were fading.

bstar
bstar
10 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Sorry for being so reflexively defensive (again) whenever a word that I don’t agree with about a Braves player is typed. I did delete a long comment before RJ posted, then thought a shorter post would hide my homerism….it didn’t. Anyway, I used the Split Finder to finally check on something I had suspected for years about Glavine. It appears true: his walk rate indeed did rise with runners on. Comparing walk rates overall to rates with runners on, Glavine has the third-highest increase in history for long-career pitchers (1000 IP with ROB). Pitcher name: increase in BB9 w/ROB vs.… Read more »

bstar
bstar
10 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Doug, thanks, but actually all these pitchers, including Lohse, were/are excellent with runners on.

Pitcher: tOPS+ w/bags empty, tOPS+ w/ROB

K Lohse: 93, 110 (over 100 is good)
G Maddux: 91, 115
T Glavine: 97, 104
F Jenkins: 96, 106
Eckersley: 98, 103

bstar
bstar
10 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Cancel that, Doug. I have it reversed! Over 100 is not good! Delete these last two posts if you want. Thanks! I need to rethink this one.

tag
tag
10 years ago

I seem to remember a John dig at Jake last year. 🙂 If I recall correctly (big big if), John didn’t think it possible for him to keep pitching as well as he’d been because of his lack of strikeouts. Well, he certainly has corrected that.

I just hope he can keep it up long enough for the kiddie cor(e/p) to develop. And I hope John’s reverse jinx will work on Baez and HIS strikeouts, only in the other direction.

mosc
mosc
10 years ago

I think Arrieta’s success will last. He’s not throwing tremendously different stuff than he did in years past. His stuff was always pretty damn good. He is throwing a ton more sliders though (29% this year vs 14% before), particularly to righties and also keeping the ball down (23% in 2014 improved from 18% lower third strikes). His sinker moves quite a bit and it’s only gotten nastier in the lower part of the zone. Lefties didn’t like him much last year either, he had a substantial reverse platoon split in 2013 thanks to his impressive change that has added… Read more »