Stealing home: never with two strikes unless …

Unless you’re a backup catcher with exactly one stolen base in your career. Then it’s a great play … especially if it works.

That’s what happened back in 1982, four hours into this game on what was no doubt a steamy August afternoon in St. Louis. Tom Tango posted a discussion of this play on his website last month, and I thought it might also interest our readers here at HHS.

More after the jump on the rules implications of stealing home with two strikes on the batter.

This was part of the UPI account of the game.

Brummer Steal 1982-08-22

So, not only were there two strikes, but also two out. That additional detail didn’t escape the notice of the opposing Giants, as the UPI account goes on to relate.

Brummer Steal Call 1982-08-22

 

 

 

 

 

 

So, did the umpire call the pitch as he claims to have done? You be the judge. Here’s the play.

I don’t know about you, but I’ve seen a lot of games and don’t ever recall the umpire calling a pitch while standing in the batter’s box. Most umpires, of course, only signal when strikes are called so the absence of Pallone making a strike call might plausibly be inferred as a ball call. But, the more likely explanation is that Pallone forgot all about the throw being a pitch and just got himself in position to make a call on the tag play at home.

I was interested in how often a play like this (or any steal of home with two strikes) had happened. But, unfortunately, B-R’s Event Finder was of no help as, surprisingly, stolen bases are not among the events that can be searched (even searching the more generic “Balls Not In Play”, meaning batted balls not in play, fails to turn up any stolen bases).

As rare as the play may be, the rules of baseball do cover it, as noted by one of the commenters on Tango’s blog. Specifically, rule 6.05 (n) which reads:
6.05 A batter is out when…
(n) With two out, a runner on third base, and two strikes on the batter, the runner attempts to steal home base on a legal pitch and the ball touches the runner in the batter’s strike zone. The umpire shall call “Strike Three,” the batter is out and the run shall not count; before two are out, the umpire shall call “Strike Three,” the ball is dead, and the run counts.

And, there’s also rule 7.07 that would come into play
7.07 If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead.

So, what do you think? Did the umpire make the right call? Or, did he miss the call entirely by failing to rule ball or strike on the pitch? And, what if the batter, with two strikes on him and an opportunity to end the game, had stood his ground and possibly even swung at the pitch? (try visualizing that scene)

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hartvig
Hartvig
10 years ago

If he did call it he either did so well before it crossed the plate or from a bad angle. From the perspective of where the camera was it looked like it might have been outside but if you moved the camera to the left (from the pitchers perspective) the ball should appear to shift towards the plate- whether enough to make it a strike I don’t know. I do know that I’m always amazed at how many of these split second calls that umpires do get right however. My question is why was Brummer running in the first place?… Read more »

Hartvig
Hartvig
10 years ago
Reply to  Doug

I thought the most persuasive argument I read in the comments was to compare it to a steal of second base where the batter fouls the pitch off.

Even if the runner touches second before the batter makes contact he still has to return to first base as long as the pitcher has begun his delivery before he does so.

pcg
pcg
10 years ago

If the umpire had called a strike, the run would not have counted. As for the call, it looked a bit as if the pitcher adjusted and threw a mini-pitchout, something the catcher could easily handle. It certainly looked just a bit high and outside (at least by 2014 strike zone standards). What a ballsy (and strange) play.

AlbaNate
AlbaNate
10 years ago

What I love most about that article is the way they describe everyone, including Brummer (!) as being surprised: “Everybody in the ballpark was caught by surprise , including Brummer and his manager, Whitey Herzog.”

Suggests to me that it was a botched play in some way, maybe someone having missed a sign.

no statistician but
no statistician but
10 years ago
Reply to  AlbaNate

When I was 15 and playing league ball, I led off an inning with a single, got the sign to steal, and stole second. The third base coach—team manager—gave me a dirty look, but again gave me the steal sign, so, what the hey, I took off for third and made it without a play. Another dirty look and some words like “I want to talk to you, son,” but then he gave me the steal sign a third time, and I thought, “Well, he’s nuts, but—” So I raced down the line, barreled into the catcher (who was injured… Read more »

Hartvig
Hartvig
10 years ago

Move over Billy Hamilton, step aside Rickey Henderson and get out of my way Lou Brock.

nsb is in the house

oneblankspace
10 years ago

As Jack Buck called it,

Good God Almighty! Brummer’s stealing home

John Autin
Editor
10 years ago

Fascinating question re: counting the run if the runner crosses home before the pitch arrives for 3-strikes/3-outs. My gut says it should count. But I’m trying to think through the implications of rule 6.05(n), which Doug quoted. If the runner stealing home on 2 strikes touches the ball in the strike zone, then it’s strike three; and if that happens with 2 outs, the run doesn’t count, period. Now, one might wonder if timing is relevant in that situation — did contact occur before or after the runner touched home? But the absolute ruling of no run if this occurs… Read more »

RJ
RJ
10 years ago

I always find these strange plays quite interesting (and I love JA’s continuing exasperation at the inconsistencies of the rulebook). Does anyone know if there exists a sort of ‘Ask the Umpire’ column somewhere? There’s a famous football (soccer) comic strip/column in the UK called “You are the Ref”, in which hypothetical and bizarre scenarios are put forward and a professional referee explains what he would have done. Here is an example of its cricketing sister column, “You are the Umpire”:

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/aug/08/you-are-the-umpire-steve-smith

Brent
Brent
10 years ago
Reply to  RJ

I have about 20 years worth of my grandfather’s Baseball Digests (1950ish to 1970ish) and there was a column in there called something like “you make the call” where they had all sorts of weird/strange scenarios that they set up and then tried to give you an answer for.

Lawrence Azrin
Lawrence Azrin
10 years ago
Reply to  Brent

@13/Brent,

Yes, I also remember the BD column of unusual situations. Some of them were intentionally implausable/ridiculous, such as:

“If a batter hits a ground single to the outfield and a kangaroo happens to hop across the field, and the ball bounces into the kangeroo’s pouch, how do you rule it?”

I suppose this might be plausible in Australia…