The LDS series begin later this week. After the jump, a quick look at the players who have historically fared the best and the worst in the LDS round.
Also, a look at which teams match up best and worst with which other teams, based on this season’s play.
Here are the players on this year’s playoff teams who have historically performed well in the LDS.
Rk | Player | G | Tm | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carlos Beltran | 13 | STL | 62 | 49 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 14 | 11 | 7 | .408 | .516 | .878 | 1.394 |
2 | Chris Young | 8 | OAK | 34 | 29 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 13 | .345 | .441 | .897 | 1.338 |
3 | Andre Ethier | 8 | LAD | 29 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | .304 | .448 | .739 | 1.187 |
4 | Ryan Ludwick | 8 | CIN | 35 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | .333 | .429 | .633 | 1.062 |
5 | Stephen Drew | 8 | BOS | 35 | 33 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 12 | .333 | .371 | .667 | 1.038 |
6 | Skip Schumaker | 11 | LAD | 22 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | .400 | .455 | .550 | 1.005 |
7 | Brandon Phillips | 8 | CIN | 37 | 36 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 5 | .361 | .351 | .639 | .990 |
8 | David Freese | 10 | STL | 40 | 37 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 14 | .351 | .400 | .568 | .968 |
9 | Torii Hunter | 23 | DET | 100 | 90 | 30 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 12 | .333 | .384 | .567 | .951 |
10 | Brian McCann | 7 | ATL | 32 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 10 | .300 | .313 | .633 | .946 |
11 | Justin Upton | 7 | ATL | 31 | 25 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | .280 | .419 | .520 | .939 |
12 | Mike Napoli | 13 | BOS | 42 | 36 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 12 | .278 | .381 | .556 | .937 |
13 | Jay Bruce | 8 | CIN | 32 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | .259 | .375 | .556 | .931 |
14 | Justin Morneau | 7 | PIT | 29 | 29 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | .310 | .310 | .621 | .931 |
15 | Jason Giambi | 32 | CLE | 122 | 95 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 22 | 20 | .316 | .451 | .463 | .914 |
16 | Allen Craig | 8 | STL | 37 | 29 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | .241 | .405 | .483 | .888 |
17 | Daniel Descalso | 9 | STL | 26 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 7 | .273 | .292 | .591 | .883 |
18 | Shane Victorino | 19 | BOS | 78 | 72 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 2 | .306 | .351 | .514 | .865 |
19 | David Ortiz | 25 | BOS | 109 | 93 | 25 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 16 | 26 | .269 | .376 | .484 | .860 |
20 | B.J. Upton | 13 | ATL | 58 | 53 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 18 | .245 | .310 | .547 | .858 |
21 | Jhonny Peralta | 14 | DET | 57 | 50 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 10 | .320 | .404 | .420 | .824 |
The lack of players for Oakland and Pittsburgh is more a reflection of the lack of playoff experience on these teams, rather than a suggestion that their players have not performed well in the LDS. Perhaps more worrisome is the Tigers’ situation with lots of playoff experience but not many names on the list above.
Here are the players who have struggled in the LDS round.
Rk | Player | G | Tm | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Michael Young | 9 | LAD | 36 | 35 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | .143 | .167 | .229 | .395 |
2 | Dustin Pedroia | 10 | BOS | 47 | 42 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | .119 | .213 | .214 | .427 |
3 | Carl Crawford | 9 | LAD | 37 | 35 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | .171 | .216 | .257 | .473 |
4 | Sean Rodriguez | 8 | TBR | 24 | 22 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | .182 | .250 | .227 | .477 |
5 | Matt Kemp | 6 | LAD | 27 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 13 | .148 | .148 | .333 | .481 |
6 | Alex Avila | 9 | DET | 31 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13 | .143 | .200 | .286 | .486 |
7 | Coco Crisp | 10 | OAK | 38 | 36 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | .194 | .237 | .278 | .515 |
8 | Drew Stubbs | 8 | CLE | 30 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | .179 | .233 | .286 | .519 |
9 | Juan Uribe | 11 | LAD | 39 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 12 | .194 | .216 | .306 | .522 |
10 | Brandon Inge | 8 | PIT | 24 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | .227 | .261 | .273 | .534 |
11 | Jon Jay | 10 | STL | 40 | 32 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 8 | .188 | .289 | .250 | .539 |
12 | Yadier Molina | 20 | STL | 82 | 75 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 10 | .227 | .293 | .253 | .546 |
13 | Austin Jackson | 10 | DET | 43 | 36 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 15 | .194 | .293 | .278 | .570 |
14 | Zack Cozart | 5 | CIN | 24 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | .238 | .333 | .238 | .571 |
15 | Asdrubal Cabrera | 4 | CLE | 21 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | .176 | .222 | .353 | .575 |
16 | Matthew Joyce | 8 | TBR | 25 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | .208 | .240 | .375 | .615 |
17 | Nick Swisher | 22 | CLE | 84 | 75 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 18 | .200 | .274 | .347 | .620 |
18 | Nick Punto | 9 | LAD | 31 | 27 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | .259 | .333 | .296 | .630 |
19 | Matt Holliday | 15 | STL | 60 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 14 | .200 | .267 | .382 | .648 |
20 | Joey Votto | 8 | CIN | 33 | 28 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | .286 | .364 | .286 | .649 |
Surprising number of Cardinals on the second list, including some of their core players. The Rays and Indians also appear over-represented, especially relative to their lack of representation in the first list.
Now to the team-by-team matchups. I’m showing 2013 pitching and batting splits for each team against the others in their league. Obviously very small sample sizes but at least gives you an idea about which teams have fared better against which opponents. I’ll leave it to you readers to decide whether there’s any predictive value in those observations.
Oakland Athletics
Oakland looks most vulnerable to Cleveland. A series with the Tigers looks to be a shootout.
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | OAK | DET | 7 | .811 | 63 | 277 | 246 | 42 | 70 | 18 | 1 | 8 | 41 | 4 | 2 | 26 | 63 | .285 | .348 | .463 | .346 | 117 |
14 | OAK | BOS | 6 | .711 | 54 | 230 | 191 | 32 | 43 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 2 | 34 | 53 | .225 | .345 | .366 | .276 | 93 |
20 | OAK | TBR | 6 | .619 | 54 | 204 | 183 | 15 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 39 | .208 | .286 | .333 | .237 | 67 |
22 | OAK | CLE | 7 | .607 | 63 | 254 | 227 | 19 | 49 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 61 | .216 | .290 | .317 | .272 | 64 |
Cleveland Indians
Cleveland would love to face Oakland. The Indians’ pitching and hitting has struggled to compete with the other teams, with a combined record of 7-25 on the season.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CLE | OAK | 2.51 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 61.0 | 49 | 19 | 17 | 5 | 1.148 | 9.0 | 2.90 |
20 | CLE | TBR | 4.67 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.0 | 49 | 30 | 27 | 6 | 1.404 | 7.6 | 1.83 |
21 | CLE | DET | 5.89 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 171.0 | 208 | 120 | 112 | 22 | 1.684 | 8.2 | 1.95 |
22 | CLE | BOS | 5.93 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 60.2 | 64 | 43 | 40 | 3 | 1.566 | 11.3 | 2.45 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | CLE | OAK | 7 | .813 | 63 | 258 | 231 | 33 | 61 | 15 | 0 | 12 | 31 | 5 | 2 | 22 | 53 | .264 | .328 | .485 | .292 | 119 |
16 | CLE | BOS | 7 | .677 | 63 | 265 | 236 | 30 | 57 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 9 | 1 | 26 | 64 | .242 | .317 | .360 | .312 | 85 |
17 | CLE | TBR | 6 | .676 | 54 | 213 | 196 | 23 | 45 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 49 | .230 | .283 | .393 | .270 | 82 |
20 | CLE | DET | 19 | .647 | 171 | 716 | 651 | 70 | 145 | 38 | 2 | 16 | 68 | 18 | 2 | 54 | 173 | .223 | .286 | .361 | .277 | 76 |
Tampa Bay Rays
Tampa wants to avoid the Tigers and Red Sox, preferring Oakland and Cleveland.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | TBR | OAK | 2.29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 51.0 | 38 | 15 | 13 | 5 | 1.098 | 6.9 | 2.17 |
10 | TBR | BOS | 3.54 | 7 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 172.2 | 130 | 71 | 68 | 13 | 1.095 | 8.6 | 2.80 |
15 | TBR | CLE | 3.91 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 53.0 | 45 | 23 | 23 | 7 | 1.132 | 8.3 | 3.27 |
19 | TBR | DET | 4.25 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 53.0 | 57 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 1.491 | 8.0 | 2.14 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | TBR | CLE | 6 | .721 | 54 | 226 | 199 | 30 | 49 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 44 | .246 | .329 | .392 | .287 | 96 |
18 | TBR | OAK | 6 | .695 | 54 | 214 | 194 | 22 | 49 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 17 | 43 | .253 | .313 | .381 | .302 | 88 |
19 | TBR | BOS | 19 | .676 | 171 | 727 | 643 | 57 | 149 | 30 | 2 | 17 | 56 | 16 | 6 | 73 | 159 | .232 | .312 | .364 | .280 | 84 |
22 | TBR | DET | 6 | .605 | 54 | 212 | 196 | 16 | 44 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 51 | .224 | .274 | .332 | .285 | 65 |
Detroit Tigers
Detroit has owned Cleveland this year, but would prefer to avoid Boston.
Rk | Split | G | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | DET | TBR | 18 | 2.52 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 53.2 | 44 | 16 | 15 | 3 | 1.062 | 8.6 | 3.92 |
14 | DET | CLE | 73 | 3.45 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 175.0 | 145 | 70 | 67 | 16 | 1.137 | 8.9 | 3.20 |
20 | DET | OAK | 25 | 5.58 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61.1 | 70 | 42 | 38 | 8 | 1.565 | 9.2 | 2.42 |
23 | DET | BOS | 26 | 6.05 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 61.0 | 77 | 43 | 41 | 11 | 1.639 | 7.7 | 2.26 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 | DET | OAK | 7 | .852 | 63 | 280 | 257 | 40 | 80 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 32 | .311 | .362 | .490 | .321 | 118 |
8 | DET | CLE | 19 | .851 | 171 | 789 | 692 | 120 | 208 | 48 | 4 | 22 | 113 | 5 | 3 | 80 | 156 | .301 | .375 | .477 | .357 | 118 |
12 | DET | TBR | 6 | .788 | 54 | 234 | 207 | 25 | 57 | 11 | 0 | 8 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 47 | .275 | .343 | .444 | .316 | 101 |
15 | DET | BOS | 7 | .758 | 63 | 264 | 238 | 35 | 67 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 52 | .282 | .342 | .416 | .335 | 95 |
Boston Red Sox
A Red Sox/Rays series looks like it will be a pitchers’ duel. Boston would love to face Cleveland but would prefer to avoid Oakland.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | BOS | TBR | 2.93 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 175.0 | 149 | 57 | 57 | 17 | 1.269 | 8.2 | 2.18 |
11 | BOS | CLE | 3.71 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 63.0 | 57 | 30 | 26 | 4 | 1.317 | 9.1 | 2.46 |
19 | BOS | DET | 4.65 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 60.0 | 67 | 35 | 31 | 6 | 1.483 | 7.8 | 2.36 |
23 | BOS | OAK | 5.30 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 52.2 | 43 | 32 | 31 | 6 | 1.462 | 9.1 | 1.56 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | BOS | DET | 7 | .902 | 63 | 280 | 248 | 43 | 77 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 40 | 4 | 0 | 23 | 52 | .310 | .382 | .520 | .353 | 126 |
16 | BOS | CLE | 7 | .767 | 63 | 276 | 236 | 43 | 64 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 31 | 76 | .271 | .360 | .407 | .379 | 94 |
22 | BOS | OAK | 6 | .629 | 54 | 220 | 199 | 21 | 44 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 41 | .221 | .292 | .337 | .269 | 59 |
23 | BOS | TBR | 19 | .612 | 171 | 697 | 625 | 71 | 130 | 33 | 3 | 13 | 69 | 18 | 2 | 59 | 165 | .208 | .280 | .333 | .259 | 55 |
Atlanta Braves
A series with the Reds or Pirates looks to be a bit of a shootout. Against the Dodgers or Cardinals, expect more of a pitchers’ duel.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | ATL | LAD | 1.88 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 62.1 | 44 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 0.963 | 7.9 | 3.44 |
9 | ATL | STL | 2.85 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 60.0 | 49 | 20 | 19 | 4 | 1.067 | 6.8 | 3.00 |
11 | ATL | PIT | 2.95 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 61.0 | 48 | 23 | 20 | 6 | 1.082 | 9.0 | 3.39 |
19 | ATL | CIN | 4.16 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 62.2 | 64 | 30 | 29 | 7 | 1.372 | 8.8 | 2.77 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | ATL | CIN | 7 | .779 | 63 | 263 | 239 | 35 | 62 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 63 | .259 | .319 | .460 | .309 | 114 |
8 | ATL | PIT | 7 | .749 | 63 | 268 | 222 | 26 | 51 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 37 | 62 | .230 | .348 | .401 | .272 | 108 |
16 | ATL | LAD | 7 | .697 | 63 | 261 | 227 | 27 | 55 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 60 | .242 | .323 | .374 | .296 | 94 |
17 | ATL | STL | 7 | .671 | 63 | 246 | 230 | 21 | 61 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 53 | .265 | .306 | .365 | .324 | 86 |
St. Louis Cardinals
St. Louis would love to face the Reds but would prefer to avoid the Dodgers. A series with Atlanta looks like a low-scoring affair.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | STL | ATL | 2.70 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 60.0 | 61 | 21 | 18 | 5 | 1.233 | 8.0 | 4.08 |
16 | STL | CIN | 3.93 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 174.0 | 150 | 77 | 76 | 20 | 1.247 | 8.2 | 2.36 |
17 | STL | PIT | 4.03 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 174.1 | 172 | 85 | 78 | 19 | 1.354 | 8.3 | 2.52 |
19 | STL | LAD | 4.21 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 62.0 | 67 | 30 | 29 | 3 | 1.516 | 7.0 | 1.78 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 | STL | CIN | 19 | .743 | 171 | 736 | 667 | 102 | 174 | 47 | 1 | 20 | 94 | 4 | 2 | 55 | 134 | .261 | .319 | .424 | .298 | 102 |
18 | STL | PIT | 19 | .658 | 171 | 754 | 673 | 87 | 167 | 40 | 3 | 5 | 80 | 7 | 2 | 62 | 140 | .248 | .319 | .339 | .305 | 81 |
20 | STL | LAD | 7 | .649 | 63 | 261 | 236 | 27 | 56 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 53 | .237 | .301 | .347 | .289 | 77 |
22 | STL | ATL | 7 | .621 | 63 | 238 | 220 | 20 | 49 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 45 | .223 | .271 | .350 | .262 | 69 |
Los Angeles Dodgers
The Dodgers match up well with Pittsburgh, but want to avoid the Braves who have exposed weaknesses in LA’s defense.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | LAD | PIT | 2.33 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 54.0 | 35 | 14 | 14 | 4 | 0.963 | 9.3 | 3.29 |
6 | LAD | CIN | 2.42 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 63.1 | 44 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 0.995 | 8.7 | 3.21 |
7 | LAD | ATL | 2.66 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61.0 | 55 | 27 | 18 | 7 | 1.344 | 8.9 | 2.22 |
11 | LAD | STL | 3.05 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 62.0 | 56 | 27 | 21 | 4 | 1.194 | 7.7 | 2.94 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 | LAD | STL | 7 | .753 | 63 | 274 | 239 | 30 | 67 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 48 | .280 | .359 | .393 | .339 | 109 |
19 | LAD | PIT | 6 | .650 | 54 | 216 | 194 | 18 | 49 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 42 | .253 | .310 | .340 | .309 | 81 |
21 | LAD | CIN | 7 | .594 | 63 | 245 | 229 | 16 | 52 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 63 | .227 | .263 | .332 | .288 | 64 |
22 | LAD | ATL | 7 | .540 | 63 | 244 | 223 | 17 | 44 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 55 | .197 | .253 | .287 | .242 | 50 |
Pittsburgh Pirates
Pittsburgh needs to avoid the Dodgers. There could be some runs scored on both sides in the other matchups.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 | PIT | LAD | 3.06 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 53.0 | 49 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 1.245 | 7.1 | 2.47 |
14 | PIT | CIN | 3.25 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 174.1 | 149 | 71 | 63 | 18 | 1.273 | 8.0 | 2.11 |
19 | PIT | ATL | 3.82 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 61.1 | 51 | 26 | 26 | 10 | 1.435 | 9.1 | 1.68 |
20 | PIT | STL | 4.00 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 175.2 | 167 | 87 | 78 | 5 | 1.304 | 7.2 | 2.26 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | PIT | STL | 19 | .761 | 171 | 756 | 664 | 85 | 172 | 43 | 6 | 19 | 82 | 5 | 4 | 64 | 161 | .259 | .334 | .428 | .312 | 115 |
9 | PIT | CIN | 19 | .729 | 171 | 735 | 645 | 73 | 156 | 20 | 3 | 27 | 72 | 10 | 6 | 61 | 159 | .242 | .321 | .408 | .279 | 106 |
15 | PIT | ATL | 7 | .680 | 63 | 250 | 221 | 23 | 48 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 61 | .217 | .296 | .385 | .271 | 92 |
23 | PIT | LAD | 6 | .535 | 54 | 212 | 189 | 14 | 35 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 56 | .185 | .255 | .280 | .238 | 52 |
Cincinnati Reds
The Reds would prefer to avoid their division mates. A matchup with Los Angeles looks to be a low-scoring affair, but there could be some runs scored in a series with the Braves.
Rk | Split | W | L | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | CIN | LAD | 2.12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 63.2 | 52 | 16 | 15 | 6 | 0.942 | 8.9 | 7.88 |
14 | CIN | PIT | 3.52 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 173.2 | 156 | 73 | 68 | 27 | 1.250 | 8.2 | 2.61 |
21 | CIN | ATL | 5.02 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 61.0 | 62 | 35 | 34 | 11 | 1.328 | 9.3 | 3.32 |
22 | CIN | STL | 5.10 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 173.0 | 174 | 102 | 98 | 20 | 1.324 | 7.0 | 2.44 |
Rk | Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | tOPS+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | CIN | ATL | 7 | .778 | 63 | 268 | 236 | 30 | 64 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 61 | .271 | .337 | .441 | .333 | 116 |
13 | CIN | STL | 19 | .696 | 171 | 730 | 641 | 77 | 150 | 29 | 3 | 20 | 75 | 3 | 3 | 67 | 158 | .234 | .313 | .382 | .280 | 93 |
17 | CIN | PIT | 19 | .677 | 171 | 738 | 644 | 71 | 149 | 25 | 1 | 18 | 66 | 9 | 9 | 73 | 154 | .231 | .320 | .357 | .276 | 89 |
21 | CIN | LAD | 7 | .609 | 63 | 248 | 221 | 17 | 44 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 61 | .199 | .275 | .335 | .247 | 70 |