A look at Greinke’s comparables

Over the last 5 years combined (age 24-28), Zack Greinke pitched 1,036 innings with a 123 ERA+, amassing 23.0 WAR by the Baseball-Reference method (rWAR) and 28.4 by FanGraphs (fWAR). His new 6-year contract covers age 29-34. I’m no forecaster, but I thought it would be interesting to find pitchers who were broadly similar to Greinke during age 24-28 and see what they did over their next six years.

 

(All comparison groups herein are “since 1920” unless specified. All ERA+ averages are weighted by innings.)

Group 1 — There are 36 retired pitchers who had at least 22 rWAR for age 24-28. Since I used no upper boundary on rWAR, Group 1 averaged 27.5 rWAR for the 24-28 period, well above Greinke’s 23.0 rWAR and close to his 28.4 fWAR; they also averaged 1,255 IP and a 133 ERA+.

For age 29-34 combined, Group 1 averaged 14.2 rWAR (median 12.4), with 914 IP and a 118 ERA+. A mark of 20+ rWAR was reached by 9 out of 36 (25%), while 14 had less than 10 rWAR (39%).

But maybe Group 1 is skewed by those who were overworked in their 20s. So I made another control group of retired pitchers who had IP and ERA+ similar to Greinke’s 1,036 IP and 123 ERA+ from age 24-28. Specifically:

Group 2 — These 52 retired pitchers had 886 to 1,186 IP from 24-28 (+/- 150 to Greinke), with an ERA+ of at least 115. I left WAR out of this picture. For ERA+, I set no upper bound, but set the lower bound so as to produce an average close to Greinke’s mark.

For age 24-28, Group 2 averaged 1,032 IP with a 125 ERA+, very close to Greinke’s numbers. Stars in this group included Pedro MartinezLefty Grove (with his best years still to come), Bob Gibson (ditto), Sandy KoufaxWarren SpahnJim BunningBret SaberhagenJerry Koosman and many more.

For age 29-34 combined, Group 2 averaged 12.9 rWAR (median 11.5), with 884 IP and a 116 ERA+. A mark of 20+ rWAR was reached by 12 of 52 (23%), while 24 had less than 10 rWAR (46%) .

But maybe it’s best to focus on recent pitchers, from the age of 5-man rotations, with a further requirement that they were productive at age 28:

Group 3 — From 1982-2006, the 18 pitchers who from age 24-28 had 800 to 1,200 IP and an ERA+ of at least 115, and had at least 3.0 rWAR in their age 28 season. I did not limit this group to retired pitchers, but did require that all were in the majors at age 24 and at age 28, and that their full 24-28 span was included in the time period. (The last rule excluded Mario Soto, who was 24 in 1981; he would have lowered the 29-34 averages, since he was finished at 31.)

From 24-28, Group 3 averaged 1,036 IP (exactly Greinke’s total), with a 130 ERA+ (Greinke 123) and 22.3 rWAR (Greinke 23.0). Their weighted average ERA+ is boosted by Pedro’s absurd 189; the median was 123, which happens to be Greinke’s exact figure.

For age 29-34, Group 3 averaged 16.2 rWAR (median 16.4), with 951 IP and a 119 ERA+. A mark of 20+ rWAR was reached by 5 of 18 (28%, but with two more at 19.7), while another 5 had less than 10 rWAR.

Three of Group 3 topped 30 WAR for age 29-34 — Roy Halladay (37.5), Pedro (31.6) and Mike Mussina (31.4) — but 4th-best was Chuck Finley at 21.5.

All but four of this group were still active at 34: Ben McDonald was done at 29, Jose Rijo at 30 (except for an ineffective comeback at 36), and Jack McDowell and Brad Radke at 33.

____________________

To make explicit a trend you’ve surely noticed, the decline in value for all three groups came not just from how well they pitched, but how much they pitched. Group 3 had the best retention of innings, but they still declined from an average of 207 IP per year for 24-28 to 159 IP/year for 29-34, a drop of more than 23%. Group 2 dropped by 29%, and Group 1 by almost 40%.

____________________

Lastly, just for fun, what about the pitchers graded “most similar” to Greinke through age 28 by Similarity Score? I’ll just present the list, without making any claim for true similarity:

  1. Alex Fernandez (956)
  2. Andy Benes (956)
  3. Bill Gullickson (950)
  4. John Smoltz (949)
  5. Ismael Valdez (947)
  6. Larry Christenson (946)
  7. Josh Beckett (946)
  8. Mark Gubicza (946)
  9. Ralph Terry (944)
  10. Bill Monbouquette (943)

For age 29-34, Smoltz tops that group with 19.7 rWAR — and nobody else even reached 10. Beckett has 9.8 with two years to go … but I still wouldn’t bet the house on it.

____________________

I’ll leave the conclusions to others. But for those convinced that Greinke’s raw stats for the last two years — like 9.4 SO/9 and 4.05 SO/BB — paint a truer picture than his 109 ERA+, I’ll make two cautionary notes:

  • Out of 53 retired pitchers with 1,500+ IP in the last 20 years, Javier Vazquez ranks 9th in SO/BB. He’s 6th in SO/9 and 15th in BB/9. But he’s 24th in ERA+, at 105. OK, part of his problem was a high rate of HRs, which Greinke doesn’t share (he’s been a little better than league average over the past two years combined). But another problem for Vazquez was pitching with men in scoring position, and that same problem has bedeviled Greinke each of the last three years.
  • In 2000, 25-year-old Glendon Rusch had a 111 ERA+ in 191 IP for the Mets. His actual ERA was 4.01, but with great control and a good K rate, his 3.57 SO/BB ranked 5th in the NL, and his FIP was 3.50. I felt sure we’d stolen another one from the Royals. In 2001, with another strong SO/BB ratio (3.63, 6th in the NL), his ERA plumped to 4.63, while his FIP was 3.81. His future still seemed bright. But in the remaining eight years of his career, Rusch had an 86 ERA+ in 777 IP, producing just 1.3 rWAR.

Yes, those are just two data points. And I don’t deny that strikeouts and walks are very important markers. But they’re not the whole story. And while I don’t claim to grasp all the ways that defense has affected Greinke’s results, his BAbip last year was .310, one point below his career mark and just three points over his Cy Young season. No doubt a better defense should help him, but exactly how much remains to be seen.

Your thoughts?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hartvig
Hartvig
12 years ago

New York has probably been getting their monies worth out of Sabathia, jury is still out on Halladay & Lee (although they we older) but I look at Greinke and I have to think- Barry Zito.

RJ
RJ
12 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

It’s almost as if the Dodgers looked up Route 101, saw that San Francisco had won two World Series, and concluded that the key to success was to sign an average pitcher to a ridiculous contract. BTW:

Zito, ages 22-25: ERA+ 142
Greinke, ages 22-25: ERA+ 148

Zito ages 26-28: ERA+ 110
Greinke ages 26-28: ERA+ 106

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago

If Greinke was a hitter, you would scream “Norm Cash” (and maybe not as good). 2009 looks like an aberration. His last three years are not as good as I would have expected them to be, given his age. He’s being paid like 2009, but that’s the only season of really excellent performance. I’m not sure this is a Zito contract, but it seems like a large overpay, and the opt out makes it worse. When you throw in the signing bonus, he’s going to get over $80M for three years, and then decide whether he wants to shake the… Read more »

Jason Z
12 years ago

To this point CC has definitely worked out. The last two years could be dicey. As for Greinke, I am stunned. Even with his insane 2009 season, his career ERA+ is merely 114. He gives nothing in the clubhouse. The Dodgers just went crazy for someone who will be lucky to be a number 3 starter. The Dodgers seem to just be throwing money around. This will not end well. Hanley Ramirez is an insult to the game. Tremendous ability, but no inclination to hustle. Pete Rose must feel the bile rise in his throat every time he sees Ramirez.… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago

Not to pile on, but if I were to give you a choice of two players, one, a pitcher who, from 2010-12 had ERA+ of 100, 103, and 114, and a BWar of 3.2, 1.4, and 3.3, and the second, a hitter who, during the same period, had an OPS+ of 129, 120, and 126, and a WAR of 3.4, 1.5 and 3.5, since Greinke is off the board, how much would you pay the second guy?
Nick Swisher, call your agent.

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

I was shocked when the initial rumors surfaced over how much Greinke might get. And then it actually happened! As Mike L says, 2009 looks like a huge outlier. Granted, he also quite good in 2008 but the last three years, not so much. John’s analysis obviously gives Greinke the benefit of the doubt by including his 2008 and 2009 seasons. I thought I’d take a look at starters since 1980 who had between 7.4 and 8.4 WAR for their ages 26-28 seasons (Greinke was in the middle with 7.9). Here’s the list I come up with (17 pitchers): Brad… Read more »

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

I also decided to try and find pitchers who had a big year at about the same age as Greinke’s, followed by three seasons of being so-so. First name I came up with was Jon Matlack. Matlack had 8.8 WAR as a 24 year old but only 6.3 for the next three seasons combined. Matlack was a bit schizophrenic after that, posting seasons of 5.9, 0.5, 4.1, -0.9, 1.9, and -0.3 WAR. Next up was Tom Glavine who had 8.2 WAR at age 25 but only 8.5 total for the next three years. After that, Glavine was quite good reeling… Read more »

Artie Z
Artie Z
12 years ago

Let’s look at this from the perspective of the best case scenario. What would be the absolute best case scenario that history has to offer for Greinke – that he has a run like Pedro from ages 29-34? Maybe a more durable Pedro (the other top pitchers – Grove and Gibson – are from different eras making comparisons and “what ifs” even more difficult)? Pedro averaged 27 starts and 178 IP with 5.3 WAR and a 151 ERA+ from ages 29-34. If Greinke turns into a more durable Pedro (looking at Pedro’s averages per 162 games) we could suppose Greinke… Read more »

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  Artie Z

I think people are really not keeping up with the times in terms of money. Teams are spending more and more (not the Yankees however) across the league. If you remove pre-arb and arbitration players from the mix entirely and just look at the yearly cost and performance of the players who fill the remaining spots, you’ll see it costs you a lot of money to get a WAR. We like taking the total league WAR and total league payroll to look at value but it doesn’t work like that. Seniority skews costs in the baseball world. In other words,… Read more »

Bryan O'Connor
Editor
12 years ago

John, you touched on it at the end, but I think the defining thing about Greinke is not necessarily his success, but the way he’s achieved it. You reference the 5.4-win difference between his fWAR and his rWAR over the past five seasons. That has to be the biggest difference of any active pitcher, right? From a fielding-independent standpoint, Greinke has been among the best pitchers in the league in each of the last four seasons (I’m probably being a little generous re: 2011 because of his inning count), but the ERAs aren’t keeping up. Since exceeding his FIP in… Read more »

Bryan O'Connor
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Well, Nolasco’s never had a 2.16 ERA over a full season. I think Nolasco’s better than 4.49 and not as good as 3.83. One way to tease out the possible reasons behind a difference in FIP and ERA is to use Fangraphs’ Value tab and look at BIP-Wins and LOB-Wins. Balls in play have been rough on Nolasco over the past five years (-3.4 wins). I chalk most of that up to defense/randomness, though he’s startlingly consistent in his awfulness. LOB-Wins encompass everything else that leads to run prevention, and he’s another 4 wins in the hole there. That suggests… Read more »

bstar
bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  Bryan O'Connor

Bryan, I’m surprised that even someone who takes FIP as literally as you is reaching a conclusion that Greinke “should get better”. You know full well that FIP’s ability to forecast future ERA goes down as a player’s career progresses. With someone like Tim Hudson who Mike D mentioned below, it would be silly to project an ERA for Hudson this year that matches the last few years’ FIP without taking into consideration that he has outperformed his FIP by close to half a run per 9 over the course of his career. Greinke’s ERA-FIP discrepancy is even larger than… Read more »

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

John – According to an article over on Grantland, Greinke’s biggest problem has been his BABIP with runners in scoring position. Last year his BABIP with no one on was .307 but it was .373 with runners in scoring position. This was the biggest discrepancy of any qualified pitcher. Two years ago it was .330 vs .351 and three years ago it was .293 vs .349. So there’s a definite pattern of him struggling with RISP.

http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/44714/pondering-zack-greinkes-147-million-deal

bstar
bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

JA, on Fangraphs go to pitching Leaders and then “Career”. Click on Advanced and it will give you E-F(ERA – FIP). Choose 2008-2012 for the years, set a IP minimum, and then click on E-F and it will sort the leaders for you. For the last five years, here are the guys who have the most positive E-F with at least 700 IP:

1. Luke Hochevar 0.99
2. Ricky Nolasco 0.75
3. Livan Hernandez 0.59
4. Derek Lowe 0.53
5. Carl Pavano 0.43

Greinke is ninth on the list at 0.34

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=700&type=1&season=2012&month=0&season1=2008&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=18,d

Mike D
Mike D
12 years ago
Reply to  Bryan O'Connor

Mariano Rivera career ERA, 2.21; FIP 2.75. Tim Hudson, career ERA, 3.42; FIP, 3.78. Matt Cain, career ERA, 3.27; FIP, 3.65. (xFIP, 4.19, if you’re a fan of that stat. I remain dubious.) While FIP is mostly excellent, it is generally accepted that some pitchers can consistently outperform their FIPs. They are more the minority, but they certainly exist. Knuckleballers fit in that category, and we’ve seen R.A. Dickey’s gap between ERA and FIP grow as he’s mastered his unique knuckler, where his ERA has been half a run to 3/4 a run better than his FIP. Riveras’ cutter consistently… Read more »

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago

The opt out is a bet that salaries duration will continue to rise. It’s probably a good bet but not a guarantee. If you more closely at some of the more recent signings it tells you the market Has been revaluing things quite a bit the last few years. Types of players are going in and out of vogue

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

John – I do have to say that I’m quite disappointed that you did a full blown analysis of the Greinke signing and yet so far have ignored the Indian’s mega-signing of Mark Reynolds. I realize that as a Tiger’s fan, this signing scares the living daylights out of you but I do hope to see more balance in your postings. 🙂

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

In all seriousness, the Reynolds’ signing is the sort of thing that should get a GM fired. Immediately. What’s the point? The Indians are going to be horrible with or without Reynolds. At best they’ll win 63 games instead of 62. He’s clearly not a long-term solution. So why sign him? Why not give a younger player a chance and see what they can do? Maybe you get lucky and a marginal prospect turns out to be better than expected. If not, what does it really matter?

Honestly, if Mark Reynolds is the answer, you’ve asked the wrong question!

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

BTW, this is an interesting article on Greinke that mostly focuses on his struggles with depression and social anxiety disorder. However, they also toss in a tantalizing nugget that I wish they had explored more. Apparently Greinke uses “sophisticated sabermetrics” to inform his pitching approach!

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8744647/zack-greinke-shown-ready-la

bstar
bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  Ed

That was a good read. When the author mentions “sophisticated sabermetrics” I think she’s referring to Geinke’s comment (I think it was after his Cy Young season) that he had been working on lowering his FIP. It’s kind of ironic that we were discussing above how Greinke’s FIP is usually better than his ERA. I suppose he’s at least accomplishing his goals there.

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Some comparisons between Sanchez and Greinke:

http://www.baseballanalytics.org/baseball-analytics-blog/2012/12/12/zack-greinke-and-anibal-sanchez-closer-than-you-think.html

http://mlb.si.com/2012/12/07/anibal-sanchez-zack-greinke-hot-stove/

The conclusion from the first article: “Considering how close his resume is to Greinke’s, Sanchez could be a bargain if he ends up signing for something like five years and $75 million.” (Tigers actually got him for five years, $80 million.)

Mike L
Mike L
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I find the Sanchez signing incomprehensible. Not merely because the Tigers were willing to pay that much, but because there were other teams close to that number. Greinke’s contract is still ridiculous, but this one is quite possible worse.

Doug
Doug
12 years ago

John,

Re: FG’s 30 results per page. I was able to export an entire query result to Excel with one click. It’s not just the current page that is exported.