Stopped Short at Shortstop

In 2011, there were five shortstops in the majors who topped 4 Wins Above Replacement (WAR), using Baseball-Reference’s formula:

Troy Tulowitzki 5.6 WAR
Asdrubal Cabrera 4.8
Jose Reyes 4.7
Yunel Escobar 4.4
J.J. Hardy 4.2

In the context of recent major league baseball, that was a perfectly normal number of shortstops to be in the 4.0 WAR and over range.  Indeed, over the past fifteen full seasons, there have been 82 player-seasons by shortstops of 4 or more WAR, an average of about 5.5 such player-seasons a year.  There have  been at least four shortstops to reach at least 4 WAR in each of the past 15 seasons, and in 2006 there were actually nine guys at short who  reached 4 WAR.  So how are major league shortstops doing in 2012 in this respect?  The answer after the jump.
Well, there is not a single shortstop in the majors right now who is at or on pace for 4 or more WAR in 2012.  Here are the top 2012 WAR numbers by shortstops right now (shortstops are defined for purposes of this post as guys who played at least half their games during the season at short):

Erick Aybar 3.4
Elvis Andrus, Brendan Ryan and Ian Desmond 3.1
J.J. Hardy 3.0
Alcides Escobar and Jose Reyes 2.9
Starlin Castro and Asdrubal Cabrera 2.8
Jimmy Rollins and Yunel Escobar 2.6

Aybar has played in 131 games this season, and with 13 games left in the regular season for the Angels, he’s on pace to finish with a WAR around 3.7 or 3.8.  It is very possible Erick, or any of the others on the list above, could have a hot last two weeks of the season and reach the 4.0 level. But the days remaining for anybody to get there are dwindling.

It would be amazing if not one shortstop makes it to 4 WAR in 2012.  At least one shortstop has had 4 or more WAR, in every season since 1901. That includes even 1994, when the season was ended by the players’ strike on August 11, with a third of the schedule remaining unplayed (shortstop John Valentin had a 4.1 WAR total in 1994 despite the truncated season).  There have only been a small number of years since 1901 in which only one shortstop reached the 4 WAR level: 1973 and 1977 (Bert Campaneris was the only 4+ WAR SS in those seasons), 1959 and 1961 (Ernie Banks was the sole guy in those two years), 1932 (Joe Cronin), 1927 and 1929 (Travis Jackson), and 1923 (Joe Sewell). Other than that, there have always been at least two guys playing short getting to the 4 or more WAR level, and usually more than two. Over the whole 111 seasons from 1901 through 2011, there have been an average of about 3.6 shortstops per season reaching the 4 WAR or more level.

As we staring at the strong possibility that not one shortstop will reach a 4 WAR in 2012, the question arises: What’s going on here? Are we merely seeing a one-year fluke?  Certainly the injury-absence of Troy Tulowitzki, the most reliable producer of high WAR numbers among current shortstops, plays a role.  But injuries happen every season, and in the past we’ve always ended up with at least one 4+ WAR shortstops, and usually several more than one, regardless of injuries.  Is there an overall downward trend developing in high-level talent at short?  Is there some aspect of the WAR measurement itself that is underestimating this year’s crop of shortstops?  Will one or more of the 2012 shortstops step on the gas and get to that 4.0 level in these last two weeks — allowing this class to avoid becoming the first without a 4.0+ WAR guy since the 19th century?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed
Ed
12 years ago

And in 1981, which was an even shorter season than 1994, two shortstops were over 4.0 and two others were close.

Yount 4.7
Burleson 4.4
Concepcion 3.6
Trammell 3.6

Bryan O'Connor
Editor
12 years ago

Did anybody else jump on b-r before even finishing this piece to see what Derek Jeter’s WAR is? 2.4 Essentially, he gives up all of his above-average offensive production with his defense, making him an average player with a slight boost for standing in the vicinity of second base for 8-9 innings a game. Fangraphs gives him 3.5 WAR, depsite the worst infield UZR in the American League. In response to your main question, I think this is a fluke of injuries and underperfomance, much like last year’s 3B field. I struggle with b-r’s filter’s, but according to fangraphs, no… Read more »

Jacob
Jacob
12 years ago
Reply to  Bryan O'Connor

This is exactly what I did. 🙂

Doug
Editor
12 years ago

There’s a first time for everything.

Of the five guys who did it last year, all had a season at or very near their career best. This year, three have regressed slightly (but enough), one has cratered (Escobar) and one is injured.

And, the guys who were close last year have either stayed close (Aybar, Andrus, Ryan) or have cratered (Peralta).

Andy
Admin
12 years ago

The formatting on this post is totally whacked. I fixed your more tag so there is at least a jump, and all the nasty formatting is now saved for the standalone post page.

Andy
Admin
12 years ago
Reply to  birtelcom

Looks good to me. It looks like some HTML elements got added while on the visual editor page–although I’m not sure how that could happen unless you were doing some unusual cutting and pasting or breaking tags.

Hartvig
Hartvig
12 years ago

One other factor I can think of – besides Tulowitzki being injured- was Hanley Ramirez being moved to third base. Five years ago those two WERE the future of the position. It does seem to run in cycles at shortstop however. From the early 60’s until the late 70’s the best the position had to offer was Luis Aparicio, Maury Wills, Jim Fergosi, Bert Campaneris, and Dave Concepcion. All very good, worthy players but little more than a handful of 6+ WAR seasons among them. Better than the 1920’s and 40’s and the 50’s except for Ernie Banks (and a… Read more »

Joseph
Joseph
12 years ago

It seems like SS is over-represented in the top 10 in each league for defensive WAR. I think it’s possible that these extremely above average defensive players make it so that a player with good offense and bad defense takes a bigger hit on his war–Jeter for example. I don’t know if it works that way or not. But I did notice that in 2004, Jeter’s Rfield was -13 and his dWAR was -.4. This year, his Rfield is -15, but his dWAR is -1.1. I have no idea if this makes sense or not. I’m sure one of you… Read more »

Ed
Ed
12 years ago

I’ll comment on Asdrubal Cabrera. I know Indian’s fans are quite frustrated as this is the 2nd year in a row that he’s performed much worse in the 2nd half as compared to the first. Last year his OPS dropped off 107 points in the second half; this year it’s dropped off 181 points. Earlier this year I commented on how he seemed to have vastly improved his K/BB ratio. Whereas he normally struck out 2-3 times for every walk, through the first part of the year his ratio was about 1:1. And then came July. In July he struck… Read more »

Joseph
Joseph
12 years ago

Here’s an example of how strangely unintuitive WAR seems to me sometimes:

September 6 through 20, Jeter’s batting is (all numbers from BBR):

G: 12
PA: 59
AB: 54
Hits: 20
R: 9
BA: .370
RBI: 11
BB: 4
OBP: .414
SLG: .444

He made one error during that time.

He played 7 games as SS and 5 as DH.

His WAR went down during that time. Indeed, dWAR dropped from -1.1 to -1.3 just from the game on September 20. He didn’t make an error that day.

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  Joseph

A couple of points Joseph. Because dWAR includes a position adjustment, it’s not really a meaningful concept in and of itself. The more meaningful construct is Rfield which shows the number of runs a fielder saved or lost relative to league average. Anyway, looking through the play-by-play data for the game on the 20th, I see a few things: 1) Single to SS (Ground Ball to Weak SS); Arencibia Scores; Gose to 3B 2) Single to 3B (Ground Ball to Weak SS); Rasmus to 3B Looks like there were one or two balls hit into Jeter’s territory that ended up… Read more »

Dan McCloskey
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  Joseph

I’m far from the foremost expert on WAR here, but this is what I see: -One error in seven games is 23 over the course of the season. Still a little on the high side, even for a shortstop. -Playing 5 games as a DH gives him a significant negative positional adjustment, considering it’s almost 50% of the games over that time frame. -Jeter’s defensive shortcomings are much more about the lack of range than the number of errors he makes. You can’t see that from the stats. -Despite the .370 batting average, his OPS is .858. Very good, but… Read more »

Doug
Doug
12 years ago
Reply to  Joseph

Well, he’s currently about 3/4 of a chance per 9 innings worse than league average. With 1090 innings at shortstop, that’s 91 outs that weren’t made, or more than 3 games worth of outs compared to the average (NOT replacement level) fielder. Thus, -1.3 dWAR, if anything, may be a bit generous.

Joseph
Joseph
12 years ago
Reply to  Joseph

Thanks for the explanations. Something still seems odd in the way these things get calculated. It seems especially odd for someone to subjectively say that a SS should had started a double play on a particular batted ball. He throws the ball to the 2B, who then must throw it to 1B, for example. What happens after that is entirely out of the control of SS. Compare non-SS Pujols this year, playing mostly 1B and DH. His dWar is -.1 His oWar is 3.7. His WAR is 4.5 to Jimmy Rollins, playing all his games at SS. His dWar is… Read more »

Dan McCloskey
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  Joseph

The positional adjustment is included in both oWAR and dWAR, so oWAR + dWAR does not equal WAR, as that would count the positional adjustment twice. 10 runs is roughly one win, so you can half-ass it (using Jimmy Rollins as the example) by adding his oWAR (3.0) and his dWAR (0.3) and then subtracting the positional adjustment (7 runs = roughly 0.7 WAR). I realize that calculates to 2.6, that’s why I referred to it as half-assing it. 🙂 But, I think you get the idea from there. As far as the Jeter double plays are concerned, I think… Read more »

Ed
Ed
12 years ago
Reply to  Dan McCloskey

Yeah I was just speculating re: the double plays.

mosc
mosc
12 years ago

Yay more arbitrary WAR cutoffs. We all know that teams only look at 3.9 WAR, not 4.0 WAR. /sarcasm

I mean, at least look at total WAR by all shortstops by year or something. This analysis is not informative because WAR doesn’t equate to anything other than a vague description of how good players are. Now on top of that vagueness you’re using 2 significant figures of accuracy. Your statistics professor is waving a finger in your general direction, shame.

Dan McCloskey
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  mosc

It’s an arbitrary cutoff, but since he shows the leaders, you can see there aren’t a bunch of guys in the high 3’s, so he’s not just cherry picking.

I don’t think birtelcom’s intention was that this is some kind of exhaustive research on shortstops in 2012. But, it is informative in that it shows not a single shortstop is having a great year.

Dan McCloskey
Editor
12 years ago

@Joseph: one more thing, and perhaps the most relevant, is that you’re looking at an extremely small sample of games. It’s often said about defensive metrics that, more than any other component of WAR, you need to look at them over longer periods to be able to trust them. So, looking at just seven games could seriously throw things off.

John Autin
Editor
12 years ago

Despite the questionable tone of its presentation, the question of total WAR for the SS position is a good one. But the first thing to notice is that there are fewer everyday or even regular shortstops this year than last (all 2012 numbers projected to full season): No. with 120 G at SS: 2011 — 21 2012 — 19 (111 G) No. with 80 G at SS: 2011 — 29 2012 — 26 (74 G) Combined WAR for the top 30 in games played at SS: 2011 — 62.6 2012 — 57.3 For the top 30 in PAs who played… Read more »

bstar
12 years ago

4 WAR will not be a problem for Andrelton Simmons of the Braves next year; he has 2.4 WAR in 39 games this year. Most of that is defensive value as he has 15 fielding runs in 39 games played.

Joseph
Joseph
12 years ago
Reply to  bstar

15 fielding runs in 39 games? That’s astonishing. Over the course of a season, that would translate to roughly 60 fielding runs, yes? Ozzie Smith’s best season was around 32 Rfield, according to BBR. Another way to look at it is Smith averaged about .092 FR per game over his career. Simmons is going at a .384 FR per game pace right now. But 39 games is way too small a sample to project out over 2500 games, I think. Still seems like an amazing feat. Is he really that good? I need to try to catch a Braves game… Read more »

bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  birtelcom

It’s sustainable because most of his value is tied in fielding runs. All of the advanced metrics suggest he’s that good. It’s unlikely the metrics are going to view him differently next year. He’s that good, birtelcom.

Here’s a good article about him:

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-hit-maker-and-the-hit-taker/

John Autin
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  birtelcom

birtelcom, was that comment made with tongue in cheek? Of course it’s extremely unlikely that any rookie would hit 62 HRs in a season. But to say at that time that such a pace was unsustainable for Wally Joyner seems too strong. In Rickey Henderson’s first full year, he had 19 steals in his first 39 games, about an 80-SB pace. In the whole live-ball era to that point, there had been just four 80-SB seasons. Unsustainable pace? Rickey accelerated the pace, finishing with 100 SB that year and posting six 80-SB seasons in a 9-year stretch. It’s good to… Read more »

bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Also, fielding runs accrue at a far more stable pace than home runs or batting runs in general. If you closely follow one single player’s dWAR over the course of a year, you will see it accumulate over a very even pace over the year.

Look at the darlings of dWAR this year, Darwin Barney and Brendan Ryan. These are the same guys who were leading the league in fielding runs back in May. Batting runs are a totally different dynamic.

e pluribus munu
e pluribus munu
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

bstar, I’m wondering whether I missed something earlier this season. In May, I thought Lawrie was the dWAR dARLING. Did I simply miss seeing Ryan and Barney on top, or is this an artifact of the midseason dWAR revisions that tamed Lawrie’s stats in light of changes in shift strategy ?

bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

You called it, epm. Lawrie was getting undue credit for plays he was making in short right field, receiving added bonus points because no other third baseman was making plays in right field (because they were standing near the third-base bag). A furor uprose over Lawrie’s ungodly numbers, and finally DRS decided to stop giving credit to Lawrie on those shift plays. Although according to DRS he is still one of the better defenders in the league, he’s no longer head and shoulders above everyone else. So yes, Lawrie was out in front but isn’t anymore, but Ryan and Barney… Read more »

John Autin
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

To clarify, birtelcom — I was responding to the Joyner analogy and to the term “unsustainable.” Since the season HR record at the time was 61, with 4 seasons of 58 in a 154-G schedule, “unsustainable” is just too strong a word.

On the other hand, Simmons’s Rfield per game is apparently head, shoulders and ribcage above the previous best, and that degree of supremacy we should be more skeptical of.

Simmons’s pace, if maintained, would represent a paradigm shift. Joyner’s would not have done.

Joseph
Joseph
12 years ago
Reply to  birtelcom

Whether it is likely to be sustained is one question–but will he turn out to be an excellent or above average fielder over his career is another. I think the odds are that baring injuries he will be well above average. I can’t find too many examples that a player starts out his career for the first 40 games on a pace to break a record by 50% and not turn out to be an above average player in that area. If you want to compare hitting HR’s, has there ever been a player who started his career on pace… Read more »

Mike Felber
12 years ago

Well…How about extremely unlikely to be sustained?Though I think it is fair to use the word unsustainable when a player does something that at a record pace for less than 1/4 of a season. If we look at all players who were on such a pace for HRs, or on any pace that would have broken a record for a year, how many players made it vs. were on that pace? A homeopathic dose of players.

bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  Mike Felber

Mike, my point was that Simmons’ pace is based mainly on defensive numbers, and, unlike an “unsustainable” HR pace, fielding runs, once a pace is established, really don’t differ much within that year from month to month or first half to second half. You’d have to learn that yourself, by watching the way Rfield or UZR accumulates over a given year, and I’ve done a lot of that this year watching the top guys’ dWAR pace. That is what I’m basing my conclusion on, that Simmons will not only pass 4 WAR next season if he’s healthy and plays 150… Read more »