A Time To Fly: Home Run Leaders By Inning

Sure, Barry Bonds has more career home runs than anyone else, but he is not even close to being  the leader in late-inning home runs. Bonds hit 201 regular season homers after the sixth inning in his career, well behind Hank Aaron (236), Babe Ruth (233) and Willie Mays (215).

Indeed, although Bonds is the all-time career leader in homers hit in the third inning, and also the fourth inning, and he is tied with Ruth for the all-time lead in homers hit in the first inning, he is not the career leader in homers in any one inning after the fourth.  I’ll look at the career leaders in homers for each inning, one by one, but first you need some exercise, so click on “Read the rest of this entry”  

Most career regular season home runs in the first inning:
T1. Babe Ruth/Barry Bonds 133
3. Hank Aaron 124

Here is the answer to why no team would sign Barry to play in 2008 — it was a conspiracy to keep him from taking sole possession of the record for most first-inning homers. Barry’s failure to pass the Babe in this category will be widely cited as the reason for his failure to be elected to the Hall of Fame this winter.

The active leader in career first-inning homers is the similarly-widely-beloved Alex Rodriguez, who has hit 114 first-inning homers to date.

Most career regular season home runs in the second inning:
1. Fred McGriff 72
2. Jim Thome 69
3. Carlos Delgado 63

The greatest hitters tend to be placed high in the batting order with the hope (or, in the case of the first three slots in the order, the certainty) that they will come to the plate in the first inning. That means they don’t to tend to appear in the second inning. Babe Ruth had only 21 home runs in the second inning, and Hank Aaron only 36. So at the top of the second-inning list we get some unexpected names. Barry Bonds did come close to the top here, with 61 second-inning homers — tied with, surely you guessed it, Vinny Castilla.

Most career regular season home runs in the third inning:
1. Barry Bonds 102
2. Hank Aaron 98
3. Babe Ruth 94

A-Rod is the active leader with 81 third-inning homers.

Most career regular season home runs in the fourth inning:
1. Barry Bonds 100
2. Hank Aaaron 92
T3. Manny Ramirez and Jim Thome 90

Thome is on the disabled list, but still hopes to return by September to pick up his pursuit of sole possession of third place on the career fourth-inning home runs list.

Most career regular season home runs in the fifth inning:
1. Ken Griffey, Jr. 87
2. Barry Bonds 85
3. Babe Ruth 80

It’s good to see Junior at the top of one of these lists. He missed so much time late in his career, it’s already being forgotten by some how great a player he was. The active leader in fifth-inning homers is Albert Pujols with 66.

Most career regular season home runs in the sixth inning:
1. Hank Aaron 102
2. Alex Rodriguez 100
3. Babe Ruth 87

A-Rod, like Thome, is on the DL, and his chances of getting to 763 career homers continue to diminish. This will be the fifth year in a row in which his season oWAR has been lower than it was the previous season; a remarkably steady decline. But it seems inevitable that he he will take over the top spot on the sixth-inning home run list. Amaze (or worry) your friends and colleagues by keeping track of this stat and pointing out the moment that Alex passes Aaron.

Most career regular season home runs in the seventh inning:
1. Hank Aaron 99
2. Babe Ruth 87
3. Alex Rodriguez 68

Hammerin’ Hank dominates the seventh-inning homers list.

Most career regular season home runs in the eighth inning:
1. Willie Mays 91
T2. Babe Ruth/Barry Bonds/Hank Aaron 74

Willie Mays, who hadn’t made the top three on any of these lists so far, suddenly jumps to the top in a huge way come the eighth inning. Jim Thome is the active leader in eighth-inning homers with 67 (A-Rod has 65).

Most career regular season home runs in the ninth inning:
1. Babe Ruth 56
2. Barry Bonds 53
2. Hank Aaron 49

After all these years, the Babe remains the career leader in ninth-inning homers, and is likely to be so for many years yet. A-Rod is the active leader with just 40. There are fewer homers in the ninth mainly because many games don’t go a full nine innings, but also presumably because of the tendency in more recent decades to use a relief ace in the ninth.

Most career regular season home runs in extra innings:
1. Willie Mays 22
2. Jack Clark 18
T3. Babe Ruth and Frank Robinson 16

The extra-inning list was the subject of a post at the earlier incarnation of this blog (the poetically named “Baseball-Reference Blog”) by our old friend Raphy, who understandably emphasized the oddity of seeing Jack Clark at number two on this list (http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/9977). Clark was a fine player, but not really a guy who you would have anticipated seeing here. Albert Pujols is the active leader in extra-inning homers with 14, seemingly poised to move up on to this list. Let’s also add an extra salute to the awe-inspiring Willie Mays, the leader on both the eighth-inning and extra-inning lists.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wlcmlc
wlcmlc
12 years ago

How many did Mays hit in the 9th inning?

Look at that 8th inning – Mays, Ruth, Bonds and Aaron.

Brent
Brent
12 years ago

So is this just noise? Is there a rhyme or reason to any of these facts? I think the 1st inning and 2nd inning do have rhyme or reason which the post points out. What about late innings? I guess I could posit that Bonds (and any other left handed batter) could suffer from LOOGY syndrome in recent times, which could affect their ability to hit HRs in late innings. Anyone else have some hypotheses?

RJ
RJ
12 years ago
Reply to  Brent

In Bonds’ last couple of years he was taken out of the game early for a defensive replacement a lot. Presumably he would have homered in a few of those at-bats. But I think it’s mostly just noise, he still pops up in second place all time for the eight and ninth innings.

MikeD
MikeD
12 years ago

Could it be influenced by Bonds’ late-career surge in HRs and the absurdly high walk rate he had? In other words, was he more likely to walk in the late innings than the other hitters mentioned, thus reducing his chances to hit late-inning HRs, especially in close games?

MikeD
MikeD
12 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

…and to clarify a bit. I’m wondering if he was far more likely to receive intentional walks. Why would any one pitch to Bonds in a close game during his age 35+ seasons.

Michael Sullivan
Michael Sullivan
12 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

Agreed — I think he loses out late because of intentional and all but intentional walks.

That said, a similar thing happened to Ruth for part of his career. Less so for Aaron and Mays, because playing in a lower offense era meant that their raw numbers were nowhere near as eye popping, so they got a lot fewer IBBs.

MikeD
MikeD
12 years ago

I’ve always been a bit surprised that Ruth wasn’t walked even more frequently. The man was out-homering entire teams at one point. His danger quotient of impacting a game had to be higher than any other player in the game’s history. Of course, by 1927, the idea of walking Ruth to pitch to Gehrig wouldn’t have been a smart one.

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

reading pinstripe empire made me post this:

A lot of baseball folks thought Ruth was overrated. He didn’t bunt, he hit into double plays. His batting averages were only “good”, not “like Cobb”. They thought they could make him look silly with his big swing going over off-speed pitches. His bat was light for the time though and had enough power to wait. It took a couple years for people to understand how much of a revelation he was. And like you said, he had Gehrig helping him through the later part of his career.

Tmckelv
Tmckelv
12 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

Bonds 9th inning amount is more impressive than Ruth just because of Bonds usually facing a closer. Whereas, Ruth would typically be facing a guy who was in his 9th inning of work (after seeing him 3 times in the game already) or a “reliever”, which was the 1920’s equivalent of a current day “mop-up guy”.

Brent
Brent
12 years ago
Reply to  Tmckelv

Or Lefty Grove, which doesn’t help your point, I realize.

K&J
K&J
12 years ago
Reply to  Brent

Exactly how many places in the rotation and how many teams did Lefty pitch for?

There were studs in the era, to be sure. But, please, Ruth had a cakewalk compared to today’s hitters in the late innings.

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  Tmckelv

I thought there was a post on here that looked at ERA per inning for a lot of the all time greats and it was pretty level. I don’t know how that compares for your average starter but I doubt ERA’s in that era were very different per inning. If anything, they may be lower in the ninth as there is always more sacrificing when 1 run is all that matters. Also, if a guy needed help in just the 9th with a lead intact, it’d likely be another starter coming out of the pen not a “mop-up guy”. Starters… Read more »

Lawrence Azrin
Lawrence Azrin
12 years ago
Reply to  Tmckelv

This is only partially true, I looked at the rate of complete games vs. total games for MLB as a whole, and even by the early/mid-20s, it was only half, or a little less. For Ruth’s entire career, it looks like it was a little under 50%.

Also, even by the early 20s, many clubs did have a relief pitcher who was a “closer”, not in the sense of being our modern one-inning, only-with-a-lead, but rather to finish a close game. Although, as #13 above said, it was often the staff ace.

nightfly
12 years ago

Waitaminute, you telling me that unclutch no-goodnik stat-padding centaur wannabe Alex Rodriguez is the active leader in ninth-inning taters? And eighth inning? And is top-three all time in the seventh and sixth? B-b-b-b-but….

:::narrative asplode:::

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
12 years ago
Reply to  nightfly

nightfly, not sure if you’re being tongue in cheek or not, but calling Alex Rodriguez “unclutch” isn’t really fair. If you look at his splits you’ll find that, if anything, he’s been quite consistent regardless of inning or situation. I realize that he had some bad postseason series, but so did many other all time greats (Yogi Berra and Stan Musial come to mind), but he also had some pretty good series (Yogi Berra again comes to mind). I also realize that because he is Arod, his failures become magnified.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=rodrial01&year=Career&t=b

bstar
bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  Brooklyn Mick

So very much agree here. I think it’s when A-Rod came over to the Yankees when ESPN began to lose a lot of what they had remaining of their integrity to me. They intentionally tried to smear A-Rod by showing all at-bats in the clutch when he didn’t produce. The narrative used to go something like this, on an almost nightly basis: “Here’s A-Rod, with a 3-run homer in the third, popping out to the second baseman with a man on third and two outs in the eighth inning.” Since A-Rod being bad in the clutch is what ESPN thought… Read more »

John Autin
Editor
12 years ago
Reply to  Brooklyn Mick

Just my opinion, but I do think nightfly was facetious in his characterization of A-Rod.

Howard
Howard
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Seemed kinda obvious to me too.

Brooklyn Mick
Brooklyn Mick
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Haha…so nightfly was seriously being serious?

Hartvig
Hartvig
12 years ago

I assume that Gehrig is not on the 2nd inning leader board because of the potent Yankee offense & getting more first inning opportunities than your typical #4 hitter.

Great stuff.

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  Hartvig

To make a comparison I checked Vern Stephens’ splits for the 1949 Red Sox. He was the #4 hitter for all 155 of their games and was preceded in the batting order by Dom DiMaggio, Pesky and Williams. Gehrig was in a similar situation in 1927. Stephens had only 47 PA in the 2nd inning compared to 105 in the 1st. (Why those PA do not add up to 155 I do not know.)

Hartvig
Hartvig
12 years ago

Clever idea.

After I posted, I thought perhaps it could be explained by McGriff, Thome & Delgado hitting 5th or 6th more often. Hitting 5th or 6th at lot does seem to explain why Thome is on this list but not Delgado and especially McGriff.

PA’s (4 only) PA’s (5 & 6) HR’s (4,5&6) HR’s (4 only)
Delgado 6092 1491 427 347
McGriff 7777 1852 467 364
Thome 3096 3507 404 208
Gehrig 7002 1590 460 383

I think my original premise still holds for Delgado & McGriff.

Evil Squirrel
12 years ago

Can the extra innings list be broken down by inning as well? I’m sure even more curious names would pop up among the leaders…

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  birtelcom

birtelcom: Did you say what you meant to say? The BR Home Run Logs do break down the HRs into specific innings, extra or non-extra.

John Autin
Editor
12 years ago

FWIW, Bonds in extra innings walked in 31.4% of PAs, which is half again as much as his 1st-inning rate and his over-all rate. Most extra-inning PAs are with the game tied, so….

mosc
mosc
12 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

He should have been playing in 2008. Baseball hypocrites…

87 Cards
87 Cards
12 years ago

“{Jack}Clark was a fine player, but not really a guy who you would have anticipated seeing here.” Clark led the NL in game-winning RBIs in 1982 and was in the top ten in GWRBI in 1980 (2nd), 1981 (7th), and 1988 (6th). Clark was a good clutch hitter; he may escaped major notice due to nine years of playing on the West Coast in San Fran. His big profile years were with the speedy 1980s Cards teams (1985 NLCS winning homer, etc) where he was the big hammer on a team of greyhounds. Jack Clark was a great clutch hitter;… Read more »

Chad
Chad
12 years ago
Reply to  87 Cards

I don’t think his point was that Clark wasn’t clutch, but more that you would expect someone with a higher career home run total. Clark hit 18 of his 340 career home runs (5.29%) in extras, while only 179 of 8230 career at-bats (2.17) occurred in extras. You would just typically expect, I would think, to see a 500+ home run guy up there before Clark.

no statistician but
no statistician but
12 years ago
Reply to  Chad

Chad: Actually, Clarke played in a rather high number of extra inning games, percentage-wise. 164 out of 1994 (.082). I haven’t done all the math and have only looked up a handful of players, Bonds, Mays, Aaron, Mantle, and Berra, besides Clarke, but only Aaron of the six played in a higher percentage of extra inning games. I can’t find complete records for the earlier stars like Ruth and Williams, but perhaps someone more adept can do so. At any rate, Mantle’s 14 in 130 games almost matches Clarke’s 18 in 164 for the best percentage performance of those I… Read more »

KalineCountry
KalineCountry
12 years ago

I would love to know how my top two favorite players did; Kaline and Mantle. Their best innings and in extras. Thanks.

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  KalineCountry

Mantle had 9 HR in the 10th inning and 5 in the 11th.

Chad
Chad
12 years ago
Reply to  KalineCountry

Kaline hit 7 HR in extras, in 207 AB.

His best inning was the 1st, with 74 in 1808 AB, followed by the 3rd (61/1240) and 6th (52/1174).

Richard Chester
Richard Chester
12 years ago
Reply to  KalineCountry

The reference cited by birtelcom shows Babe Ruth as the leader in 15th inning HR with 2. Kaline’s HR log shows him with 2 15th inning HR also so he is tied with Ruth.

KalineCountry
KalineCountry
12 years ago

Thankyou Richard Chester and Chad, very much appreciated with your fast answers.

bstar
bstar
12 years ago
Reply to  KalineCountry

KalineCountry, you can look at home run logs or just click on “splits” under standard batting for Kaline. Click on “career”, and you’ve got Kaline’s career numbers split into different categories, including inning by inning.

Drew
Drew
12 years ago

No, he was mocking ESPN and most baseball fans.

KalineCountry
KalineCountry
12 years ago

Thankyou both birtlecom and bstar. I had no idea how that worked.
High Heat Stats always has great info and many knowledgeable baseball minds.

ugg australia bailey bow

It very easy to find out any matter on net as compared to textbooks, as I fount this post High Heat Stats » A Time To Fly: Home Run Leaders By Inning at this site.
ugg australia bailey bow http://sotoaviation.com/En/BlackUggBaileyBow/